DOJ Allows Lawmakers to Review Epstein Files
The Justice Department allowed Jamie Raskin, Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie to review Epstein-related files, where they questioned redactions. Coverage diverges over whether the findings signal inadequate disclosure or whether the lawmakers’ claims and disclosure push warrant scrutiny.
Lead article · The IndependentEpstein files redactions reveal victims as young as nine and implicate a high-level government official, lawmakers sayHow each side told it
- The Hindu (original publisher not identified) · Jeffrey Epstein: U.S. lawmakers reviewing unredacted filesORIGINAL PUBLISHER NOT IDENTIFIED
- International Business Times UK · US Lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna Find Six Others Implicated in Epstein FilesNO PUBLISHED LEAN
- The Guardian · Jamie Raskin accuses DoJ of cover-up after viewing unredacted Epstein filesNO PUBLISHED LEAN
- The Independent · Epstein files redactions reveal victims as young as nine and implicate a high-level government official, lawmakers sayNO PUBLISHED LEAN
Who’s in it, and how each side portrayed them
Khanna and Massie were named together by 9 of 23 outlets. Counted by outlet.
Reviewed Epstein-related records with Thomas Massie, identified names they said remained redacted, and urged the Justice Department to explain or remove redactions.
Reviewed Epstein files with Ro Khanna, identified names obscured in released records, and challenged the Justice Department’s redactions.
Reviewed Epstein-related files, raised concerns about redactions, and called on the Justice Department to explain or correct its handling.
When each side picked it up
When each side picked it up. left-leaning: 6 articles, first feb 5 · 3:15 pm, 69 hours after the first report. center: 16 articles, first feb 2 · 6:15 pm. right-leaning: 7 articles, first feb 10 · 1:09 am, 7 days after the first report. unrated: 7 articles, first feb 6 · 7:18 pm.
Get an alert when a new outlet or member joins this story.Get an alert when a new outlet or member joins this story.