Skip to main content
4 min read
▲ Good look for KhannaCongress / MembersCriminal Justice

Epstein files redactions reveal victims as young as nine and implicate a high-level government official, lawmakers say

Khanna said the files included redacted photographs and names of six men without an explanation.

Epstein files redactions reveal victims as young as nine and implicate a high-level government official, lawmakers say
Image · The Independent

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityThe Independent77/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 10, 2026
tl;dr

Three lawmakers who reviewed unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files said the records include a reference to a victim who was nine and questioned redactions they say conceal information about men linked to Epstein. They called on the Justice Department to correct what they described as improper redactions.

Community verdict

10 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ro Khanna D · CA-17

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 21

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ro Khanna
D · CA-17

Representative questioning the redaction of names and photographs

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Thomas Massie
R · KY-4

Representative questioning redactions and threatening to disclose the redacted names in Congress

Massie's version of this story ↗
Jamie Raskin
D · MD-8

Representative questioning the Justice Department’s redactions

Raskin's version of this story ↗
James Comer
R · KY-1

House Oversight Committee chairman commenting on Ghislaine Maxwell’s refusal to answer questions

Attorney general whom Epstein survivors urged to release remaining documents

Todd Blanche
R · Attorney General

Deputy attorney general responding to Massie’s posts

Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President, quoted as urging people to move on from the scandal

Part of a bigger story

15 OUTLETS
Khanna and Massie Question Redactions in Epstein Files

Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie reviewed Epstein-related records and said at least six names had been redacted. They called for the Justice Department to explain or remove some redactions. Left-leaning outlets frame the redactions as evidence of withheld information and portray Khanna’s push as a route to answers and accountability. Center outlets mainly report the lawmakers’ claims and calls for disclosure, alongside procedural details and the Justice Department’s response. Right-leaning outlets report the dispute and the department’s response, while one article criticizes the lawmakers’ disclosure effort as publicity-seeking.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…