Skip to main content
Updated
Ro KhannaD · CA-17
How outlets cover Khanna · Feb 5 – Feb 11, 2026

Khanna and Massie Question Redactions in Epstein Files

After reviewing Epstein files, Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie said at least six names were redacted and called for fuller disclosure. Coverage differs on whether to stress the lawmakers’ claims, the Justice Department’s response, or criticism of their disclosure push.

Lead article · Associated Press · CENTERJustice Department will allow lawmakers to see unredacted versions of released Epstein files - AP News
Image · Associated Press
ARTICLES
21
OUTLETS
15
AVG CRED
60MEDIUM
AVG BAL
52SOME TILT

Community verdict

10 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ro Khanna D · CA-17
● OPEN
tl;drSUMMARY ACROSS OUTLETS

Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie reviewed Epstein-related records and said at least six names had been redacted. They called for the Justice Department to explain or remove some redactions.

Left-leaning outlets frame the redactions as evidence of withheld information and portray Khanna’s push as a route to answers and accountability. Center outlets mainly report the lawmakers’ claims and calls for disclosure, alongside procedural details and the Justice Department’s response. Right-leaning outlets report the dispute and the department’s response, while one article criticizes the lawmakers’ disclosure effort as publicity-seeking.

Outlets by lean

12 RATED · 3 UNRATED

Compare by side

THE FRAMEAVG CRED 45
“Pressing for fuller disclosure”

Left-leaning coverage presents Khanna’s push as seeking answers and accountability while criticizing the Justice Department’s handling of redactions.

5 LEFT ARTICLES
The Mary SueFEB 10 · 2:40 PM ET
'Whisper the names to us': RO Khanna alleges claims most of the 'unredacted' Epstein files were 'redacted'Khanna said files described as unredacted still concealed names of alleged co-conspirators.CRED 55BAL 40 PORTRAYS KHANNA: NEUTRAL
Alternet.orgFEB 7 · 8:37 AM ET
Trump admin under fire for not launching new probe of Epstein's 'co-conspirators'Khanna urged Congress to investigate people named in the files and challenged the Justice Department’s redactions.CRED 45BAL 40 PORTRAYS KHANNA: NEUTRALALTERNET.ORG · ALSO CARRIED BY DEMOCRACY NOW!
Crooks and LiarsFEB 10 · 11:45 AM ET
Shocking Epstein Files Still Redacted, Even For CongressKhanna argued that the files could reveal a wider network of powerful people and called for answers about the abuse of underage girls.CRED 41BAL 20 PORTRAYS KHANNA: FAVORABLE

How outlets portrayed Khanna

Each article counts once, however many sites carried it. Sides are each outlet’s published lean. How portrayal is read

Left: 2 favorable, 0 critical, 0 mixed, 2 neutral. Center: 1 favorable, 0 critical, 0 mixed, 5 neutral. Right: 0 favorable, 1 critical, 1 mixed, 2 neutral.

4 UNRATED ARTICLES NOT SHOWN

When each side covered it

Articles per day by side. FEB 5: Left 1, Center 0, Right 0. FEB 6: Left 0, Center 1, Right 0. FEB 7: Left 1, Center 2, Right 0. FEB 8: Left 0, Center 0, Right 0. FEB 9: Left 0, Center 5, Right 0. FEB 10: Left 3, Center 0, Right 3. FEB 11: Left 0, Center 0, Right 1.

RIGHT-LEANING OUTLETS ARRIVED 4D LATER
FOLLOW THIS STORY

Get an alert when a new outlet covers this story.