Skip to main content
2 min read
▲ Good look for KhannaCongress / Members

Massie: Epstein Files Reveal At Least 6 'Incriminated' Men

Khanna said the Justice Department should make at least some of the redacted identities public.

Massie: Epstein Files Reveal At Least 6 'Incriminated' Men
Image · Mediaite

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityMediaite65/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 10, 2026
Mediaite
Feb 9, 2026
tl;dr

Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said they found at least six men whose identities were redacted in the Epstein files and whom they considered likely implicated. They urged the Justice Department to explain the redactions and make some identities public.

Community verdict

10 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ro Khanna D · CA-17

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 21

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ro Khanna
D · CA-17

Representative who reviewed the files with Massie and urged the Justice Department to make some identities public

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Thomas Massie
R · KY-4

Representative who discussed the redacted names and called for the Justice Department to explain or remove redactions

Massie's version of this story ↗

Official asked about the redactions

Part of a bigger story

15 OUTLETS
Khanna and Massie Question Redactions in Epstein Files

Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie reviewed Epstein-related records and said at least six names had been redacted. They called for the Justice Department to explain or remove some redactions. Left-leaning outlets frame the redactions as evidence of withheld information and portray Khanna’s push as a route to answers and accountability. Center outlets mainly report the lawmakers’ claims and calls for disclosure, alongside procedural details and the Justice Department’s response. Right-leaning outlets report the dispute and the department’s response, while one article criticizes the lawmakers’ disclosure effort as publicity-seeking.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…