'What a scumbag': House Republican under fire for being lone 'no' vote on Epstein files
Higgins cast the only House vote against advancing a discharge petition seeking the release of the Epstein files.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an identified news publisher with an attributed byline and a corrections contact, but its strongly partisan presentation and this article’s limited reporting warrant a moderate institutional score.
- Source type — A national digital news outlet; a moderate prior rather than the standing of a major wire service or newspaper of record.
- Author attribution — The article names Nicole Charky-Chami as its author.
- Transparency — The page provides a corrections email, though the article offers little detail about its reporting process.
- Editorial standards — The piece’s selection of mocking reactions and lack of Higgins’s response limit confidence in its evenhanded editorial presentation.
The article identifies the House tally and Higgins as the lone no vote, but mostly assembles social media reactions. It provides little context about the petition, the vote, or Higgins’s reasons, and includes no response or countervailing perspective.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece reports the tally but devotes most of its text to attacks on Higgins, with no response from him or other perspective on the vote.
- Counterarguments presented — No defense of Higgins’s vote or explanation of his position appears.
- Source diversity — The quoted reactions are all critical social media posts.
- Loaded language — The headline and quoted posts use insulting, accusatory language; the article attributes the quoted attacks to their authors.
- Omitted context — The story gives little information about the petition or the reasons for the vote.
The headline and selection of social media posts frame Higgins’s vote through harsh condemnation, without his explanation or a contrasting view.
- Headline — The headline foregrounds an insult directed at Higgins and says he is under fire.
- Source selection — The article selects only critical social media reactions.
- Framing — The report emphasizes mockery rather than explaining the vote or its context.
The House voted 427-1 to advance a discharge petition seeking the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, with Rep. Clay Higgins casting the lone no vote. The article reports that social media users sharply criticized Higgins afterward.
The House voted 427-1 to advance a discharge petition to the Senate seeking the release of the Epstein files. Rep. Clay Higgins, a Louisiana Republican, was the only member to vote no.
The article recounts critical reactions on social media, including posts accusing Higgins of protecting abusers and mocking his vote. These are the posters’ characterizations, not findings established by the article.
Community verdict
25 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 42
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
House member who cast the lone no vote on advancing the discharge petition
Part of a bigger story
33 OUTLETSThe House passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act 427-1, with Clay Higgins casting the sole no vote. Left-leaning outlets present Higgins’s vote as grounds for criticism, highlighting public backlash or his broader record. Center outlets mostly explain his stated privacy and due-process concerns while recounting the vote. Right-leaning outlets emphasize his privacy rationale, while some frame the disclosure push as a partisan fight.
- ARTICLES
- 42
- OUTLETS
- 33
- AVG CRED
- 66
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…
