We Have to Stop Electing Angry Idiots Like Clay Higgins to Congress
Pierce criticizes Higgins’s vote on the Epstein files and his recent claims about the 2020 election and January 6.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYEsquire is an established national publication with editorial standards and an identifiable author. This is a signed opinion column, so its institutional credibility does not make its judgments equivalent to independent reporting.
- Source type — Established national publication; source type is a strong positive prior.
- Author attribution — The column identifies Charles P. Pierce as its author.
- Editorial standards — The publisher has an established editorial operation, though this piece is explicitly opinionated.
- Source transparency — The column attributes quoted material to NBC News, The Ind, and The New York Times.
The column provides specific quotations and attributes several claims to records and other outlets, but its strongly evaluative language and limited presentation of context or competing perspectives make it weak as balanced reporting.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a one-sided opinion column that criticizes Higgins, does not offer a substantive response from him, and uses the author’s own insults and conclusions.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive counterargument or response to the column’s overall case is included.
- Loaded language — The author uses openly derogatory descriptions of Higgins.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an opinion column, and the author’s verdict is explicit.
- Source diversity — The article cites material from several outlets, but uses it to support one critical perspective.
The piece is an openly hostile opinion column directed at a Republican member of Congress. Its insults and conclusion urging readers not to elect people like Higgins make its framing strongly critical rather than neutral.
- Language tone — Uses insults including “dangerous nut” and “angry idiots.”
- Framing — Selects prior allegations and controversial statements to support a case against Higgins.
- Headline — The headline explicitly urges readers to stop electing Higgins and others like him.
Charles P. Pierce criticizes Representative Clay Higgins over his vote on the Epstein files and recent claims about the 2020 election and January 6. The column also revisits allegations about Higgins’s conduct as a police officer.
Pierce mocks Higgins’s vote on the Epstein files and recounts a 2023 incident in which Higgins pushed an activist outside the Capitol. Citing police department records, the article says Higgins was accused of using unnecessary force on a handcuffed suspect and later giving false statements; it also says he later admitted to striking the suspect. (The article attributes these details to earlier reporting and records.)
The column also describes Higgins’s recent podcast interview, in which he repeated the false claim that the 2020 election was fraudulent and alleged that federal agents had entrapped Trump supporters into attacking the Capitol on January 6. Pierce concludes by urging readers to stop electing people like Higgins.
Community verdict
25 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 42
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative criticized for his vote, public statements, and past conduct
Representative whose press availability is mentioned in recounting Higgins’s 2023 encounter with an activist
Part of a bigger story
33 OUTLETSThe House passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act 427-1, with Clay Higgins casting the sole no vote. Left-leaning outlets present Higgins’s vote as grounds for criticism, highlighting public backlash or his broader record. Center outlets mostly explain his stated privacy and due-process concerns while recounting the vote. Right-leaning outlets emphasize his privacy rationale, while some frame the disclosure push as a partisan fight.
- ARTICLES
- 42
- OUTLETS
- 33
- AVG CRED
- 66
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


