Search people, articles, bills, and more
The House rejected a proposed change to the SPEED Act, a bill aimed at streamlining environmental reviews for infrastructure and energy projects. The vote failed 205-220, falling largely along party lines.
This vote was on a proposed amendment to H.R. 4776, known as the SPEED Act. The underlying bill focuses on changing how the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is applied, specifically by narrowing the scope of environmental reviews and setting stricter limits on when federal agencies can revisit project approvals. The goal of the main bill is to accelerate the development of projects like highways and energy facilities. In the House of Representatives, an amendment is a formal proposal to modify the text of a bill before it receives a final vote. This particular vote required a simple majority to pass. Because the 'no' votes outnumbered the 'yes' votes, the proposed change was not added to the bill, and the legislation remained in its previous form. The amendment was defeated in a party-line vote, with Republicans supporting the change and Democrats opposing it. This was one of several procedural steps taken before the House ultimately passed the final version of the SPEED Act and sent it to the Senate for further consideration.
Following this vote, the House proceeded to consider additional amendments and a final vote on the passage of the SPEED Act.
OPEN BILL →Why it matters. While this specific amendment failed, the debate centers on the balance between speeding up infrastructure construction and maintaining thorough environmental protections.
Who’s affected. Project Developers: Benefit from potentially faster permit approvals under the main bill, though this specific amendment's failure means one proposed change will not be implemented. · Environmental Groups: Typically oppose efforts to narrow environmental reviews, arguing they protect communities from long-term pollution and health risks.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus was almost entirely united in opposition, with 209 members voting 'no' and only 2 voting 'yes'.
Republicans. The Republican caucus largely supported the amendment, though 11 members joined Democrats in voting 'no'.
The House rejected a proposed change to the SPEED Act, a bill aimed at streamlining environmental reviews for infrastructure and energy projects.
The vote failed 205-220, falling largely along party lines.
Members were voting on whether to add a specific modification to the bill's text. A 'yea' vote supported adding the change, while a 'nay' vote sought to keep the bill as it was currently written.
Following this vote, the House proceeded to consider additional amendments and a final vote on the passage of the SPEED Act.
While this specific amendment failed, the debate centers on the balance between speeding up infrastructure construction and maintaining thorough environmental protections.
The vote was highly polarized, with nearly all Republicans voting in favor and nearly all Democrats voting against.
The Democratic caucus was almost entirely united in opposition, with 209 members voting 'no' and only 2 voting 'yes'.
The Republican caucus largely supported the amendment, though 11 members joined Democrats in voting 'no'.
The single independent member voted 'yes'.