Search people, articles, bills, and more
How 8 sources across the political spectrum cover Susan M. Collins (Republican · Maine)
2 of 13 articles reproduce work from 1 original publisher (ProPublica). 2 more articles name another publisher as the source (ProPublica), but the copy is not verified, so they are scored as the host's own work. 2 more articles appear reproduced but the original publisher could not be identified. The "Sources" count in the sidebar reflects unique editorial voices, not the hosts that reposted them.
The New Republic (Left) frames this as negative for Susan M. Collins, while The Hill (Center) calls it mixed. Same story, different conclusions.
“Collins denied a report alleging a pay-to-play scheme involving a campaign donor as Democrats called for answers.”
“A report about an investigation into alleged donations put fresh scrutiny on Collins, whose team denies wrongdoing.”
“Collins faces corruption allegations following a report about donations and contracts, which her office calls false.”
“ProPublica reported allegations tying Collins to Navatek contracts and campaign contributions, which her staff disputed.”

“Collins is at the center of allegations linking Navatek contracts to payments to her super PAC, which her aide and the FBI deny.”

“ProPublica reports allegations of a pay-to-play arrangement involving Collins and Navatek, which her office denies.”

“ProPublica’s reporting challenges Collins’ account of an FBI inquiry into claims involving Navatek and her political orbit.”

“ProPublica reports allegations linking Navatek contracts and campaign donations; Collins’ office denies bribery and pay-to-play.”

“ProPublica reports that a contractor alleged donations were tied to federal funding sought for his company; Collins’ office denies bribery and pay-to-play allegations.”