Susan Collins and Dan Sullivan buck Senate GOP on affordability
Sullivan crossed party lines on several affordability amendments while supporting the final immigration-funding resolution.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Washington Examiner is an established national news outlet with named reporters and editorial standards, though its partisan orientation warrants some caution. The article identifies the voting activity and includes statements from both Schumer and Sullivan’s office.
- Source type — Established national outlet; partisan orientation is a consideration.
- Editorial standards — The outlet has an editorial operation, though this article provides limited sourcing detail.
- Author attribution — A reporter is named.
- Transparency — The story attributes comments to named political figures and an identified news outlet.
The article gives specific amendment counts, describes the resolution’s purpose and quotes both Schumer and Sullivan’s office. It offers limited detail about the amendments or their supporters’ arguments, and Collins did not comment.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article reports the cross-party votes, the final resolution and Sullivan’s office’s defense, as well as Schumer’s interpretation. It gives little space to the arguments for or against the amendments, and Collins did not comment.
- Counterarguments presented — Includes Schumer’s view and a response from Sullivan’s office, but no explanation from Collins.
- Source diversity — Quotes opposing political perspectives, but relies mainly on lawmakers and their offices.
- Omitted context — Provides limited detail on the amendments’ contents and rationale.
- Loaded language — Mostly neutral wording, with the framing of senators bucking party messaging.
The article uses a largely reportorial tone, describes the senators’ votes and the resolution’s purpose, and includes statements from both Schumer and Sullivan’s office. Its emphasis on the senators breaking with Republicans does not clearly favor either side.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive language, without strong partisan judgment.
- Source selection — Includes Schumer’s criticism and a response from Sullivan’s office.
- Framing — Centers on Republican senators crossing party lines while also reporting their support for the final resolution.
Sens. Susan Collins and Dan Sullivan crossed party lines on several affordability amendments during an overnight Senate vote-a-rama, but supported the budget resolution funding immigration enforcement. None of the Democratic amendments passed.
Collins and Sullivan voted with Democrats on amendments addressing costs including groceries, energy, health care and prescription drugs, as well as school meals and food stamps. Collins supported 12 of 16 amendments and Sullivan supported six. The session ran overnight, and none of the Democratic amendments passed.
Community verdict
22 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator who supported several Democratic affordability amendments and the final budget resolution
Senator who supported several Democratic affordability amendments and the final budget resolution
Collins's version of this story ↗Senator who split from Republicans on one vote and opposed the SAVE America Act amendment
Senator who opposed the budget resolution and several Republican amendments
Senator who split from Republicans on one vote and opposed the SAVE America Act amendment
Senate minority leader who said Collins and Sullivan were worried about reelection
Senator who supported some health insurance and drug-pricing amendments
Senator who split from Republicans on one vote and supported an emergency disaster aid provision
Senator who opposed the budget resolution
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








