Show-Me Critics Crying Foul After Sketchy Sen. Schmitt B-Ball Allegation Against Smith
Schmitt’s accusation against Jack Smith is presented as a public mistake after he apparently had the wrong team.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThis is a locally focused blog post with an attributed author, but the text offers little sourcing or reporting detail beyond a quoted excerpt and the author's commentary. Its mocking framing and limited transparency about the underlying reporting constrain institutional credibility.
- Source type — A blog, which generally has less formal editorial oversight than an established newsroom.
- Editorial standards — The post uses opinionated language and provides little detail about its reporting or verification.
- Author attribution — An author is identified as Tony, though no further reporting credentials are provided.
- Transparency — The excerpt does not clearly identify the source of the quoted account.
The post conveys a specific allegation and the reported basketball-team mix-up, but provides little sourcing, independent verification, or response from Schmitt or Smith. Its commentary is openly mocking rather than a developed, balanced account.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The post presents a sharply critical account and includes a mocking social media jab, but no response from Schmitt or fuller explanation of the hearing exchange. The short text offers little context to balance its framing.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Schmitt or explanation of his account is included.
- Loaded language — The author calls the incident a sting and describes Schmitt as doubling down.
- Source diversity — The account relies on a quoted excerpt and a social media jab, with no range of sources.
- Omitted context — The post gives little detail about the hearing or how the error was established.
The post frames Schmitt’s conduct as a public mistake and uses disparaging language about him and Missouri Republicans. Its critical framing of a Republican senator gives it a left-leaning presentation.
- Language tone — Uses phrases such as “had to sting” and “doubled down” to ridicule Schmitt.
- Framing — Centers the episode as an embarrassing error by a Republican senator.
- Source selection — Includes a social media jab at Schmitt and the Missouri GOP, with no countervailing response.
Sen. Eric Schmitt accused former special counsel Jack Smith of perjury over a basketball-game claim, but the article says Schmitt had the wrong team. The post criticizes Schmitt for apparently relying on bad information and doubling down.
The post says it looked as though someone gave Schmitt bad information and that he doubled down. An excerpt says Schmitt accused former special counsel Jack Smith of perjury at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing over Smith’s denial that he attended a specific Atlanta Hawks game in 2024; it adds that Schmitt had the wrong team.
The post characterizes the episode as political gamesmanship and says a social media jab from “Mayor Q” mocked Schmitt and the Missouri GOP.
Community verdict
7 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 51
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator accused of making a perjury allegation against Jack Smith based on a basketball-game claim
President whose investigations are described as the subject of the hearing
Part of a bigger story
21 OUTLETSAt a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Eric Schmitt questioned Jack Smith about whether Smith attended an Atlanta Hawks game and accused him of perjury. Amy Klobuchar said Schmitt may have confused the Hawks with the Iowa Hawkeyes; Smith had attended an Iowa-Maryland game in Maryland. Left-leaning outlets frame the exchange as Schmitt's mistaken accusation and emphasize his continued defense and the political fallout. Center outlets focus on the team confusion and criticism, with some connecting it to Schmitt's political profile. Right-leaning outlets split: one presents Schmitt's questions as catching Smith, while the other foregrounds Lawrence O'Donnell's criticism of Schmitt.
- ARTICLES
- 51
- OUTLETS
- 21
- AVG CRED
- 64
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


