Eric Schmitt’s a Joke. The Assaults on Jack Smith Are Anything But.
Tomasky criticizes Schmitt’s questioning of Jack Smith and his subsequent defense of the claims he made.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New Republic is an established national publication, but this is an explicitly opinionated column rather than straight news reporting. Its institutional standing supports a moderate score, while the opinion format and limited evidence of the publisher’s correction practices here counsel against a higher one.
- Source type — An established national magazine, though this page is an opinion column.
- Transparency — The author and publication are identified.
- Editorial standards — The publication has an established editorial operation, but this article is not presented as neutral reporting.
The column supplies specific details about the hearing, lawsuit, referral and testimony, and includes responses from Smith’s lawyers and Jamie Raskin. Its strongly argumentative framing and limited engagement with the opposing legal case leave important counterarguments underdeveloped.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece is an opinion column that advances a clear critical argument. It reports the Republican allegations and legal actions but mostly rebuts them, with little sustained presentation of their rationale or supporting arguments.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly an opinion column and argues a position throughout.
- Counterarguments presented — Republican claims are described, but their supporting case is not developed at comparable length.
- Loaded language — Frequent dismissive and inflammatory descriptions shape the presentation.
- Source diversity — Includes statements from Smith’s lawyers and Raskin, with limited direct support from the Republican figures criticized.
The column uses openly hostile language toward Schmitt and Republicans and frames their actions as politically motivated attacks on Smith. Its argument and characterization are strongly critical of the Republican figures discussed.
- Language tone — Uses insults and emphatic language to disparage Schmitt and other Republicans.
- Framing — Presents Republican scrutiny of Smith as a politically motivated effort to punish him.
- Source selection — Includes responses from Smith’s lawyers and Raskin but little extended presentation of the Republican case.
Michael Tomasky argues that Senator Eric Schmitt’s questioning of Jack Smith at a Senate hearing was both embarrassing and part of broader Republican efforts to target the former special counsel. He points to Senator Marsha Blackburn’s lawsuit and a criminal referral by Representative Jim Jordan as examples.
Tomasky criticizes Schmitt’s questioning of Smith, saying it relied on an unfounded conspiracy theory and that Schmitt continued to defend his claims afterward. He also describes Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley’s questioning about Smith’s supposed relationship with former CIA director John Brennan, which Smith denied.
The article discusses Blackburn’s lawsuit alleging that Smith’s subpoenas for lawmakers’ phone records violated the Speech or Debate Clause, and Jordan’s criminal referral based on Smith’s testimony about phone records and text messages. Tomasky argues that the referral does not establish that Smith’s answers were untruthful, while noting that Attorney General Todd Blanche said he took testimony before the committee seriously when asked whether he had considered investigating Smith.
Community verdict
4 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senate Judiciary Committee chairman who questioned Smith
Attorney General who said the department takes testimony before the committee seriously
President discussed as the subject of Smith’s investigations
Senator who filed a lawsuit against Jack Smith
Vice President mentioned in reporting about Schmitt’s political prospects
Representative who criticized the basis for Jordan’s referral
Senator who asked Blanche whether he had considered investigating Smith
Representative who issued a criminal referral against Smith
Part of a bigger story
21 OUTLETSAt a Senate Judiciary hearing, Eric Schmitt questioned Jack Smith over whether Smith had attended an Atlanta Hawks game. The exchange turned on a mix-up with an Iowa Hawkeyes game Smith said he attended. Left-leaning outlets treat the mix-up as a failed political gotcha and, in some coverage, part of a broader Republican effort to target Smith. Center outlets likewise stress the error and its fallout for Schmitt, with some highlighting the exchange’s viral reactions. Right-leaning outlets also emphasize the accusation’s collapse, with attention to Katie Britt’s viral reaction and, in one column, Schmitt’s political ambitions.
- ARTICLES
- 39
- OUTLETS
- 21
- AVG CRED
- 68
- RadarOnline · Jimmy Kimmel Roasts 'Dumb' Sen. Eric Schmitt After He Accidentally Exposed Jack Smith as a Caitlin Clark Fan in Attempted Takedown
- Alternet.org · The ominous 3-word warning everyone missed in the chaotic Jack Smith hearing
- Yahoo News · GOP Senator's Atlanta Hawks, Iowa Hawkeyes Mix-Up Backfires On Attempt To Catch Jack Smith In A Lie Tied To Fani Willis
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…









