Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for TrumpElections / Campaigns

Trump smears Muslims in unhinged late-night attack on surging Democrat

Trump’s late-night post attacked El-Sayed and reiterated his support for Rogers.

Trump smears Muslims in unhinged late-night attack on surging Democrat
Image · Raw Story

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityRaw Story57/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 8, 2026
Raw Story
Oct 8, 2026
tl;dr

Donald Trump attacked Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed in a late-night social media post, misnaming him and calling him a “Terrorist Sympathizer.” The article places the attack in the context of the competitive race against Republican Mike Rogers.

Community verdict

19 VOTES
How does this story look for
Donald Trump R · President of the United States

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 9

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who attacked El-Sayed and endorsed Rogers

PRIMARY SUBJECT

Democratic Michigan Senate candidate targeted by Trump’s post

El-Sayed's version of this story ↗

Republican Michigan Senate candidate and El-Sayed’s opponent

ALSO MENTIONED  Hasan Piker, Progressive streamer who campaigned with El-Sayed; Leslie Marshall, Democratic strategist

Part of a bigger story

9 OUTLETS
Trump Stands by Ken Paxton Endorsement After Leaked Audio

Outlets report that Trump reaffirmed his endorsement of Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton after recordings of Paxton’s comments surfaced. The coverage also describes Republican concerns about Paxton’s campaign. Left-leaning outlets emphasize Republican frustration over the audio, while two also focus on Trump’s separate attacks on Abdul El-Sayed. Center outlets focus on Trump’s continued support and the recordings’ political fallout. Right-leaning outlets portray Trump’s backing as justified and the recordings as an effort to divide him from Paxton.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…