'Sloppy' GOP Sen. Schmitt pilloried by home state paper over 'cringey' public humiliation
Schmitt accused Smith of perjury during a Senate hearing and stood by a derogatory remark about him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established digital news outlet with an identifiable author, though it is known for a strong editorial perspective. This article attributes its central criticism to a named newspaper editorial board but offers little independent reporting or response.
- Source type — An established digital news outlet, but not a major newspaper of record or wire service.
- Editorial standards — The article identifies the editorial board as the source of its judgments, but its own framing is strongly critical.
- Author attribution — The article names an author.
- Source diversity — The piece relies heavily on one newspaper editorial and does not present a substantive response from Schmitt.
The article gives specific details about the hearing and clearly attributes much of its criticism to the Post-Dispatch editorial board. It relies on a narrow source base, uses loaded language in its own framing, and provides no substantive response from Schmitt.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article primarily relays the Post-Dispatch editorial’s criticism. It mentions Schmitt standing by his remark, but does not provide his explanation or a substantive counterperspective.
- Source diversity — The central perspective comes from one newspaper editorial board.
- Counterarguments presented — Schmitt’s statement that he stood by his remark is included, but no fuller response or defense is presented.
- Loaded language — The framing includes pointed language such as “pile-on” and “embarrassed himself.”
- Opinion vs reporting — The article reports an editorial’s opinion but offers little additional reporting to broaden the account.
The article adopts a strongly critical framing of Schmitt and foregrounds an editorial board’s sharply negative assessment, without offering a substantive counterview. Its language and selection of quotes convey a clear left-leaning perspective.
- Language tone — The article uses phrases such as “pile-on” and “embarrassed himself” in describing Schmitt.
- Framing — The story is organized around a newspaper editorial condemning Schmitt’s conduct.
- Source selection — It quotes the critical editorial at length and gives no substantive defense from Schmitt.
- Headline — The headline characterizes Schmitt as “sloppy” and the episode as a “public humiliation.”
A Missouri newspaper’s editorial board criticized Sen. Eric Schmitt’s questioning of former special counsel Jack Smith, saying Schmitt wrongly accused Smith of perjury over a mistaken claim about a basketball game. The article also reports that Schmitt stood by calling Smith a “dirtbag.”
Raw Story reports that the St. Louis Post-Dispatch’s editors criticized Schmitt’s questioning of Smith during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The editors said Schmitt’s accusation relied on a mistaken claim that Smith had attended an NBA game in Atlanta, when he was watching an NCAA women’s game in Maryland.
The editorial also criticized Schmitt for calling Smith a “villain” and a “total dirtbag,” and for standing by the latter description when Sen. Amy Klobuchar chided him. The editors contrasted Schmitt’s outrage at Smith with Smith’s effort to hold President Donald Trump accountable for the 2020 election.
Community verdict
7 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 51
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Missouri senator criticized for his questioning of former special counsel Jack Smith
Minnesota senator who criticized Schmitt’s conduct
President whose 2020 election conduct and prosecution are cited by the editorial
Part of a bigger story
21 OUTLETSAt a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Eric Schmitt questioned Jack Smith about whether Smith attended an Atlanta Hawks game and accused him of perjury. Amy Klobuchar said Schmitt may have confused the Hawks with the Iowa Hawkeyes; Smith had attended an Iowa-Maryland game in Maryland. Left-leaning outlets frame the exchange as Schmitt's mistaken accusation and emphasize his continued defense and the political fallout. Center outlets focus on the team confusion and criticism, with some connecting it to Schmitt's political profile. Right-leaning outlets split: one presents Schmitt's questions as catching Smith, while the other foregrounds Lawrence O'Donnell's criticism of Schmitt.
- ARTICLES
- 51
- OUTLETS
- 21
- AVG CRED
- 64
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


