Abdul El-Sayed’s long history of trashing Obama resurfaces ahead of rally with former prez
His past criticisms of Barack Obama resurfaced ahead of a rally where the two are scheduled to appear together.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Post is an established national outlet with identifiable authors and an editorial operation, but its tabloid style and politically charged framing warrant a moderate rather than high institutional score. The article identifies prior interviews and writings and attributes its quotations.
- Source type — Established national news outlet, though its tabloid presentation tempers the score.
- Editorial standards — The outlet has an identifiable newsroom, but the article uses charged language.
- Author attribution — A named author is listed.
- Transparency — The article names the prior publications and events from which it draws quotations.
The article quotes or identifies several prior statements and gives a more recent response from El-Sayed. It offers limited independent context or competing perspectives, and its characterization of his remarks is often loaded.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article supplies multiple examples of El-Sayed’s past criticism and includes a recent statement expressing admiration for Obama. It does not include a response from Obama or much context about the statements, while its word choices reinforce a critical framing.
- Counterarguments presented — Includes El-Sayed’s recent positive statement about Obama, but no response from Obama.
- Loaded language — Several descriptions characterize El-Sayed’s comments in strongly negative terms.
- Source diversity — Quotes El-Sayed’s past and recent remarks, but includes few other perspectives.
- Omitted context — Provides little context about the circumstances or substance of the cited interviews and writings.
The report emphasizes El-Sayed’s criticism of Obama with language such as “trashing,” “badmouthing” and “hardcore progressive,” creating a critical frame of the Democratic candidate. It includes his later praise of Obama, but the overall presentation tilts right.
- Language tone — Uses loaded terms including “trashing,” “badmouthing” and “hardcore progressive.”
- Framing — Presents old criticism as resurfacing ahead of a joint rally, foregrounding possible political awkwardness.
- Source selection — Relies on El-Sayed’s past statements and a recent statement, with little outside reaction or context.
Abdul El-Sayed’s past criticism of Barack Obama resurfaced before the two are scheduled to appear together at a Detroit rally. El-Sayed’s more recent remarks say Obama inspired him and that he looks forward to meeting him.
The article revisits El-Sayed’s criticism of Obama in a 2012 essay, a 2017 interview and a 2020 panel appearance. His comments faulted Obama’s record on war, civil liberties, deportations and the economy, and criticized the Affordable Care Act as insufficiently ambitious. The article says a chronology by CNN also tracked his critiques after Obama left office.
In a statement to CNN, El-Sayed said Obama changed what was possible for someone like him and described the former president as having handled a difficult presidency, while saying more remained to be done. El-Sayed is running for Michigan’s Senate seat against Mike Rogers, and the two men are scheduled to appear with other Democratic candidates at a Detroit rally on October 24.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting El-Sayed in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward El-Sayed’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Michigan Senate candidate whose past criticism of Barack Obama resurfaced
President whose rise El-Sayed linked to Obama’s shortcomings
Republican running against El-Sayed for Michigan’s Senate seat
Former vice president who campaigned with El-Sayed
Part of a bigger story
13 OUTLETSEl-Sayed discussed negative experiences and tensions involving Black Americans and Arab Americans while describing efforts to connect with Black voters in Michigan. Right-leaning outlets generally present the remarks as politically damaging, connecting them to criticism and campaign attacks; one article instead focuses on a separate exchange with an Iranian-American student and a campaign ad.
- ARTICLES
- 16
- OUTLETS
- 13
- AVG CRED
- 56
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



