James Clyburn says backing Supreme Court Justice Thomas was a 'mistake'
Clyburn publicly reconsidered his support for Thomas’s 1991 confirmation and explained what he had expected from the justice.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYFox News is an established national outlet with an identifiable author, and its site rating supports a solid but not top-tier score. The article attributes its central statements to named speakers and identifies the television program where Clyburn spoke.
- Source type — Established national news outlet; the publisher rating is consistent with a solid score.
- Author attribution — The article names its author and identifies the speakers whose remarks it reports.
- Transparency — It identifies the interview program and notes that Fox News Digital sought comment from the Supreme Court.
- Editorial standards — The page provides no specific information about corrections or editorial standards.
The article provides named, attributed remarks from Clyburn, Thomas, Cruz and Scott, and gives context for Clyburn’s change of view. It offers multiple perspectives but little independent context or examination of the underlying judicial record.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Clyburn’s criticism as well as Thomas’s own comments and supportive reactions from Cruz and Scott. The perspectives are not supplemented by independent analysis or a response from the Supreme Court.
- Counterarguments presented — Thomas’s comments and favorable assessments from Cruz and Scott provide a counterpoint to Clyburn’s criticism.
- Source diversity — The article quotes people taking opposing positions, though all are political figures with clear viewpoints.
- Omitted context — It gives little independent context on Thomas’s judicial record or the precedents discussed.
- Loaded language — Several charged descriptions appear as quotations rather than the reporter’s own assertions.
The reporting is mostly factual and attributes its claims, but its framing and selection of responses give somewhat more space to defenses of Thomas and criticism of Democrats than to independent context.
- Source selection — Clyburn is quoted at length, but Republican senators Cruz and Scott also respond in defense of Thomas.
- Framing — The story centers Clyburn’s regret while presenting Thomas’s views and supportive reactions in detail.
- Language tone — Most statements are attributed, though the page includes emphatic, all-caps promotional headlines.
- Headline — The headline neutrally reports Clyburn’s stated regret.
James Clyburn said he regrets supporting Clarence Thomas’s 1991 Supreme Court confirmation, calling his support a mistake. Clyburn explained his earlier expectations, while Thomas, Ted Cruz and Tim Scott offered remarks defending Thomas’s views or record.
On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” James Clyburn said he no longer stands by his decision to support Clarence Thomas’s Supreme Court confirmation in 1991. Clyburn said he had expected Thomas’s background and experience to shape his professionalism and believed Thomas would uphold precedents established by the Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act. Clyburn also criticized Thomas’s judicial views.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Said his past support for Clarence Thomas’s Supreme Court confirmation was a mistake.
Senator who defended Thomas’s record and criticized Democrats’ response to him.
Senator who interviewed Thomas and defended him in response to Clyburn’s remarks.
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Clyburn says he regrets supporting Clarence Thomas’s 1991 Supreme Court confirmation and supports expanding the Court to 13 justices. Left-leaning outlets present court expansion and broader reforms as responses to the Court’s decisions, portraying Clyburn favorably. Center outlets report his changed view and explanation in restrained terms, with little opposing perspective. Right-leaning outlets mostly cast his remarks as judging Thomas through race or ideology, while Fox News also includes Republican senators’ defenses of Thomas.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 56
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


