James Clyburn All but Calls Clarence Thomas a Race Traitor
Clyburn says he regrets supporting Clarence Thomas and backs expanding the Supreme Court to 13 justices.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRedState is a partisan opinion-oriented outlet, and this piece is explicitly argumentative rather than independent straight-news reporting. The named author provides some transparency, but the article offers little indication of a broader reporting or corrections process.
- Source type — Opinion-first, partisan publisher; this is a strong prior for lower institutional credibility.
- Editorial standards — The piece is openly argumentative and does not demonstrate independent, multi-source reporting.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Transparency — The supplied page content provides limited information about corrections or reporting standards.
The piece quotes Clyburn’s remarks and identifies the broadcast context, but it is strongly interpretive, relies on a narrow set of sources, and does not include a response from Clyburn or a fuller account of the judicial decisions at issue.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes quotations from Clyburn and some of the surrounding context, but its argument is one-sided and does not offer a competing interpretation or a response from Clyburn.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive defense of Clyburn’s interpretation or response from him is presented.
- Loaded language — The author uses evaluative language and draws a pointed conclusion about Clyburn’s remarks.
- Source diversity — The article relies mainly on Clyburn’s televised remarks, Cruz’s criticism, and Thomas’s past writing.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an opinion argument rather than a balanced report.
The article uses a distinctly critical framing of Clyburn and presents Cruz’s criticism favorably. Its word choice and interpretation align with a strong conservative perspective.
- Language tone — Loaded descriptions, including “It got uglier” and “He dragged Thomas’s upbringing,” condemn Clyburn’s remarks.
- Framing — The article frames Clyburn’s criticism as racial determinism and as evidence for Cruz’s accusation of bigotry.
- Source selection — Cruz’s critique and Thomas’s writing are used to support the author’s case, without a countervailing perspective.
- Headline — The headline casts Clyburn’s remarks as nearly equivalent to calling Thomas a “race traitor.”
In a RedState opinion piece, Ben Smith criticizes Rep. James Clyburn for saying he regretted supporting Clarence Thomas and for describing Thomas as having rebelled against his background. The article also notes that Clyburn endorsed expanding the Supreme Court to 13 justices.
The article reports that Clyburn called his 1991 support for Thomas a mistake, saying he had expected Thomas’s background and experiences to shape his conduct on the bench. Clyburn also criticized Thomas’s sensitivity to the Georgia community where his grandfather grew up. Smith argues that Clyburn’s remarks imply Thomas should have ruled according to his racial background.
Smith contrasts Clyburn’s remarks with Sen. Ted Cruz’s characterization of criticism of Thomas as bigotry, and cites Thomas’s 2023 concurrence rejecting what he called a “race-infused worldview.” The article adds that Clyburn endorsed former Vice President Kamala Harris’s proposal to expand the Supreme Court to 13 justices and compared the current court to the one that decided Dred Scott.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative who regrets supporting Clarence Thomas’s Supreme Court nomination and endorses expanding the Court.
Former vice president whose Supreme Court expansion proposal Clyburn endorses.
Senator whose criticism of the treatment of Clarence Thomas frames the article’s argument.
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Clyburn says he regrets supporting Clarence Thomas’s 1991 Supreme Court confirmation and supports expanding the Court to 13 justices. Left-leaning outlets present court expansion and broader reforms as responses to the Court’s decisions, portraying Clyburn favorably. Center outlets report his changed view and explanation in restrained terms, with little opposing perspective. Right-leaning outlets mostly cast his remarks as judging Thomas through race or ideology, while Fox News also includes Republican senators’ defenses of Thomas.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 56
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


