James Clyburn says supporting Clarence Thomas for supreme court 'was mistake'
Clyburn said his past support for Thomas was a mistake and that he supports expanding the Supreme Court.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates AOL.com, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
AOL is an established digital publisher, but this page provides limited information about the reporting operation and the supplied text does not establish its corrections practices. The article has a named author and attributes its central claims to Clyburn’s interview.
- Source type — AOL is an established digital publisher, though the supplied source type is not a dedicated news category.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Editorial standards — The supplied text does not provide enough information to assess the publisher’s editorial standards.
- Transparency — The article identifies its author and interview source, but offers little transparency about the reporting process.
The article grounds its account in Clyburn’s named interview and gives context for his earlier support and his current position. It largely presents Clyburn’s view of Thomas and the court, with little counter-perspective or response from Thomas.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article provides context for Clyburn’s earlier confidence in Thomas and attributes the critical assessments to Clyburn. It does not include a response from Thomas or a substantial alternative view of the court’s decisions.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Thomas or a counterargument to Clyburn’s characterization is included.
- Source diversity — The central perspective is Clyburn’s interview, with little source diversity.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article reports statements and historical context, but some critical descriptions shape its framing.
- Loaded language — Several evaluative phrases are used, though the article attributes key judgments to Clyburn.
The account uses critical descriptions of Thomas and the Supreme Court’s direction while centering Clyburn’s criticism. Most evaluative claims are attributed to Clyburn, but the article includes little opposing perspective.
- Language tone — Descriptions such as “extremist, hard-right” and “stunning legal reversals” create a critical framing.
- Source selection — Clyburn is the principal source for the article’s assessment of Thomas and the court.
- Framing — The story is framed around Clyburn’s regret and criticism of Thomas’s record.
Republished
Republished from The Guardian. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
251 stories · 83–84 · updated Oct 6, 2026
This is The Guardian's own score, and this article is credited to The Guardian. The host score in the Source Check is AOL.com's.
James Clyburn said his 1991 support for Clarence Thomas’s Supreme Court confirmation was a mistake, citing Thomas’s later record. Clyburn also said he supports expanding the court to 13 justices, though he said that should not be Democrats’ immediate priority.
Clyburn said he had expected Thomas’s background and experience to guide him toward upholding legal precedents, but now believes Thomas has turned away from civil rights. Clyburn pointed to the Supreme Court’s decisions on abortion protections and affirmative action as examples of the court’s direction, and said he would own his earlier support for Thomas.
Clyburn said he supports expanding the Supreme Court from nine to 13 justices, a proposal Kamala Harris had also advocated. He said Democrats’ immediate priorities after the November elections should instead focus on making the country’s promise more accessible and affordable, and should not be court expansion or impeaching Donald Trump.
Community verdict
10 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative reflecting on his past support for Clarence Thomas and backing a larger Supreme Court
Mentioned in Clyburn’s comments about Democrats’ immediate priorities
Former vice-president cited as a supporter of expanding the Supreme Court
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Clyburn says he regrets supporting Clarence Thomas’s 1991 Supreme Court confirmation and supports expanding the Court to 13 justices. Left-leaning outlets present court expansion and broader reforms as responses to the Court’s decisions, portraying Clyburn favorably. Center outlets report his changed view and explanation in restrained terms, with little opposing perspective. Right-leaning outlets mostly cast his remarks as judging Thomas through race or ideology, while Fox News also includes Republican senators’ defenses of Thomas.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 56
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


