Pete Hegseth drops hammer on Democrat senator in 'sedition' storm as court martial looms after Trump's execution threat
Hegseth said the video undermined military discipline and announced that the department was reviewing Kelly’s statements and actions.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Daily Mail, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The Daily Mail is an established publisher with an identifiable newsroom, but its tabloid presentation and sensational headline temper confidence in its institutional standards. The article identifies its reporter and quotes the principal figures, though it provides limited independent verification or context.
- Source type — An established international news publisher, with a tabloid style that warrants caution.
- Editorial standards — The reporting attributes key claims, but the headline uses sensational phrasing.
- Author attribution — A named political reporter is credited.
- Transparency — The article identifies its sources for the principal statements but offers little additional sourcing.
The article includes attributed statements from Hegseth and Kelly and explains the stated jurisdictional basis for the investigation. It gives little independent legal analysis, does not include an outside expert or Pentagon documentation, and offers limited context for the dispute.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Hegseth’s rationale and Kelly’s response, along with the reported presidential threat. It does not provide independent legal analysis or broader context about the investigation’s legal basis.
- Counterarguments presented — Hegseth’s criticism is paired with Kelly’s response to the investigation and threats.
- Source diversity — The main statements come from the officials at the center of the story, with no independent expert or documentary sourcing.
- Omitted context — The article does not include outside legal analysis of the jurisdiction or the investigation.
- Loaded language — The headline is dramatic, but the article attributes the most charged terms to its subjects.
The article’s headline is dramatic, but the body mainly reports statements and actions from the people involved without adopting a clear ideological position. Its descriptions of Trump’s execution demands are direct accounts of the reported statements.
- Language tone — The headline uses sensational phrasing, while the body is mostly reportorial.
- Source selection — The article quotes Hegseth and Kelly, presenting statements from both sides of the immediate dispute.
- Framing — The story centers the investigation and the presidential threats without a clear ideological argument.
Republished
Republished from Daily Mail. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
455 stories · 54–55 · updated Oct 13, 2026
This is Daily Mail's own score, and this article is credited to Daily Mail. The host score in the Source Check is Daily Mail's.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth opened an investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly over a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders. The story links the investigation to President Donald Trump’s calls for the lawmakers in the video to be executed and reports that the other participants are outside the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.
The article reports that Hegseth opened a Pentagon investigation into Kelly after Kelly appeared in a video with other Democratic lawmakers urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse illegal orders. Hegseth said the video undermined military discipline; the article says Kelly remains subject to military law because he is a retired officer available for recall.
Kelly told the Daily Mail that the investigation and Trump’s calls for his arrest and execution would not intimidate him. The article reports that Trump called the lawmakers’ actions “seditious” and “treason” and reposted a demand to hang them. It also says Hegseth will not investigate the other five lawmakers because they are outside the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.
Community verdict
37 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 11
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Secretary of Defense who opened the investigation
President whose statements called for the lawmakers’ execution
Trump's version of this story ↗Michigan senator who appeared in the video
New Hampshire representative who appeared in the video
House Democratic leader who condemned Trump’s threats
Pennsylvania representative who appeared in the video
Colorado representative who appeared in the video
Part of a bigger story
9 OUTLETSOutlets agree the Pentagon opened a review of Sen. Mark Kelly after he appeared in a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders; Hegseth said Kelly’s conduct would be reviewed. Left-leaning outlets frame the review as a threat following Kelly’s statement about refusing illegal orders. Center outlets largely report the review, possible military proceedings and responses from Kelly and Hegseth, with Reuters noting legal experts differ. Right-leaning outlets emphasize alleged misconduct and military discipline; one article also notes lawmakers have not identified a specific illegal order.
- ARTICLES
- 11
- OUTLETS
- 9
- AVG CRED
- 65
- The Independent · FBI wants to interview Mark Kelly and other Dems as veterans blast Pete Hegseth's 'sham' investigation
- Yahoo News · 'The View': Alyssa Farah Griffin Thinks Hegseth Is Coming for Mark Kelly 'Because He's Being Sidelined' in Ukraine Negotiations
- al · 'F--- you guys': Ruben Gallego sticks up for Mark Kelly against Hegseth's 'insane' probe
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








