Pete Hegseth drops hammer on Democrat senator in 'sedition' storm as court martial looms after Trump's execution threat
The Pentagon opened an investigation into Kelly after he appeared in a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Daily Mail, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The Daily Mail is an established publisher with an identifiable newsroom, but its tabloid presentation and sensational headline temper confidence in its institutional standards. The article identifies its reporter and quotes the principal figures, though it provides limited independent verification or context.
- Source type — An established international news publisher, with a tabloid style that warrants caution.
- Editorial standards — The reporting attributes key claims, but the headline uses sensational phrasing.
- Author attribution — A named political reporter is credited.
- Transparency — The article identifies its sources for the principal statements but offers little additional sourcing.
The article includes attributed statements from Hegseth and Kelly and explains the stated jurisdictional basis for the investigation. It gives little independent legal analysis, does not include an outside expert or Pentagon documentation, and offers limited context for the dispute.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Hegseth’s rationale and Kelly’s response, along with the reported presidential threat. It does not provide independent legal analysis or broader context about the investigation’s legal basis.
- Counterarguments presented — Hegseth’s criticism is paired with Kelly’s response to the investigation and threats.
- Source diversity — The main statements come from the officials at the center of the story, with no independent expert or documentary sourcing.
- Omitted context — The article does not include outside legal analysis of the jurisdiction or the investigation.
- Loaded language — The headline is dramatic, but the article attributes the most charged terms to its subjects.
The article’s headline is dramatic, but the body mainly reports statements and actions from the people involved without adopting a clear ideological position. Its descriptions of Trump’s execution demands are direct accounts of the reported statements.
- Language tone — The headline uses sensational phrasing, while the body is mostly reportorial.
- Source selection — The article quotes Hegseth and Kelly, presenting statements from both sides of the immediate dispute.
- Framing — The story centers the investigation and the presidential threats without a clear ideological argument.
Republished
Republished from Daily Mail. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
455 stories · 54–55 · updated Oct 13, 2026
This is Daily Mail's own score, and this article is credited to Daily Mail. The host score in the Source Check is Daily Mail's.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth opened an investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly over a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders. The story links the investigation to President Donald Trump’s calls for the lawmakers in the video to be executed and reports that the other participants are outside the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.
The article reports that Hegseth opened a Pentagon investigation into Kelly after Kelly appeared in a video with other Democratic lawmakers urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse illegal orders. Hegseth said the video undermined military discipline; the article says Kelly remains subject to military law because he is a retired officer available for recall.
Kelly told the Daily Mail that the investigation and Trump’s calls for his arrest and execution would not intimidate him. The article reports that Trump called the lawmakers’ actions “seditious” and “treason” and reposted a demand to hang them. It also says Hegseth will not investigate the other five lawmakers because they are outside the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.
Community verdict
37 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 31
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →President whose statements called for the lawmakers’ execution
Trump's version of this story ↗Secretary of Defense who opened the investigation
Hegseth's version of this story ↗Michigan senator who appeared in the video
New Hampshire representative who appeared in the video
House Democratic leader who condemned Trump’s threats
Pennsylvania representative who appeared in the video
Colorado representative who appeared in the video
Part of a bigger story
29 OUTLETSOutlets on the left, center and right agree that the Pentagon opened a review of Sen. Mark Kelly after he appeared in a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders. The Pentagon says the review could lead to recalling him to active duty for a court-martial. Left-leaning outlets cast the review and possible court-martial as intimidation or pressure on Kelly, with some noting potential political benefits to him. Center outlets mostly recount the inquiry and possible recall, while some focus on legal uncertainty and FBI interviews. Right-leaning outlets more often emphasize criticism of Kelly’s video and present possible discipline as accountability, though some use descriptive reporting.
- ARTICLES
- 31
- OUTLETS
- 29
- AVG CRED
- 64
- Latin Times · Mark Kelly Tells Kimmel Pete Hegseth Is Carrying Out Trump's 'Playbook of Authoritarianism': How Democracies Die'
- nysun.com · Republican Senators Come to Kelly's Defense After Threats of Court Martial, FBI Investigation
- Reuters · Trump's case against Senator Mark Kelly faces steep hurdles under military law - Reuters
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…







