New Janet Mills ad slams Graham Platner over old posts on sexual assault
Mills’ campaign released an ad using Platner’s old online comments in the Senate primary.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Bangor Daily News is an established regional news organization, and this article is bylined and attributed. The report includes statements from both campaigns and identifies polling and advertising-spending context, though it offers limited independent analysis of the ad’s claims.
- Source type — Established local news outlet with a regional reporting focus.
- Source diversity — Includes statements from both campaigns and cites a named polling organization.
- Author attribution — The article identifies its author.
- Transparency — Gives context for the earlier reporting on the comments and identifies the source of the poll.
The article gives specific details about the ad, includes a response from Platner’s campaign, and provides polling and spending context. It relies mainly on campaign statements and provides little independent evaluation of the ad or the underlying comments.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story presents Mills’ ad and Platner’s campaign response, then adds polling and race context. It does not include an independent assessment of the ad’s claims or a fuller response from Platner himself.
- Counterarguments presented — Platner’s campaign manager directly responds to the ad and its message.
- Source diversity — Presents material from both campaigns and includes polling context.
- Omitted context — Does not independently assess the comments or the ad’s presentation of them.
- Loaded language — Charged phrases are attributed to the campaign or appear as campaign framing.
The article reports the ad, the response from Platner’s campaign, and race context in largely descriptive language without an evident partisan framing.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive, with campaign language attributed to its speakers.
- Source selection — Includes both Mills’ ad and a response from Platner’s campaign.
- Framing — Frames the story as a campaign ad and its implications for the primary.
Janet Mills released an ad highlighting Graham Platner’s 2013 Reddit comments about sexual violence; Platner’s campaign called it a desperate attempt to hurt his Senate primary campaign. The story places the ad in a closely contested race with high stakes for Senate control.
Mills’ ad features women who support her reading Platner’s old Reddit comments about women and sexual encounters. Platner’s campaign manager, Ben Chin, called the ad “a desperate attempt at relevance” and said Platner should not be defined by his worst online comments from a decade ago.
The article says the Maine Senate race could affect control of the Senate and that nearly $80 million had been spent on advertising by early March. It also reports that recent polls have shown Platner gaining ground against Mills and that Mills has described the prospect of Platner facing Susan Collins in the general election as a concern.
Community verdict
5 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 27
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Maine senator and possible general-election opponent
Vermont senator who supported Platner’s campaign
Part of a bigger story
11 OUTLETSOutlets agree Mills aired an ad criticizing Platner’s past online comments and that Platner responded with an ad of his own. Center outlets focus on Mills’s ad and her defense of it, including its appeal to women voters. Right-leaning outlets emphasize Platner’s response and apology, describing the exchange as a more negative turn in the primary.
- ARTICLES
- 27
- OUTLETS
- 11
- AVG CRED
- 74
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



