Search people, articles, bills, and more
The House rejected an amendment to a bill, voting 61 yes and 360 no. The amendment was not added to the bill.
The House voted on whether to adopt an amendment—a proposed change to a bill. The record provided does not describe the proposed change. ChamberLight has not yet linked this roll call to the measure it concerns. The amendment failed, so it did not change the bill. This vote did not pass or reject the bill itself; the bill still needs a separate passage vote.
The bill still needs a separate passage vote. This roll call does not establish what happened to the bill in any later vote.
OPEN AMENDMENT →Why it matters. The vote determined whether the proposed change would be added to the bill. Because it failed, the bill remained unchanged by this amendment and still required a separate passage vote.
Who’s affected. House members considering the bill: The bill proceeded without the change proposed in this amendment.
Democrats. The Democratic majority position was no.
Republicans. Republicans split, with 61 voting yes and 149 voting no; the majority position was no.
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Jul 21, 2026
The House rejected an amendment to a bill, voting 61 yes and 360 no.
The amendment was not added to the bill.
An amendment vote decides whether to add a proposed change to the bill being considered. This vote was not the final vote on passing the bill.
The bill still needs a separate passage vote. This roll call does not establish what happened to the bill in any later vote.
The vote determined whether the proposed change would be added to the bill. Because it failed, the bill remained unchanged by this amendment and still required a separate passage vote.
Democrats and the independent voted no, while Republicans were divided; the Republican majority position was also no. Eight Republicans listed in the record voted yes, against their party's majority position.
The Democratic majority position was no.
Republicans split, with 61 voting yes and 149 voting no; the majority position was no.
The one independent voted no.