Skip to main content

S.Amdt. 6805 to S. 4668 (Protect College Sports Act of 2026)

Sep 28, 2026
OUTCOME · AMENDMENT REJECTED (49-50)
49/ 99NEEDED 50
Threshold: Simple Majority
HEADS UP
  • Amendment, not the bill.This vote modifies the underlying bill but does not pass or reject the bill itself. The bill still needs a separate passage vote.
WHAT THIS VOTE DID

The Senate rejected S.Amdt. 6805, a proposed change to another amendment to the Protect College Sports Act of 2026, by 49–50. The vote did not decide whether to pass the bill.

MORE DETAIL →

The Senate voted on S.Amdt. 6805, a proposal to change another amendment, S.Amdt. 6776, to the Protect College Sports Act of 2026. The amendment was rejected, 49–50. That means this proposed change was not adopted; the vote did not pass or reject the underlying bill.

PROCEDURE
CATEGORY
amendment
NEEDED
Simple Majority
COALITION
Party-line
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

Latest action (Sep 28, 2026): Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 77 - 22. Record Vote Number: 250. (text: CR S5044-5063).

OPEN BILL →
STAKES

Why it matters. The vote rejected one proposed change to a bill addressing college athlete NIL deals, transfers, and revenue sharing. The linked record does not specify how this particular amendment would have changed the bill.

Who’s affected. College athletes: The underlying bill would set federal rules affecting NIL agreements, transfers, and revenue sharing, though this vote did not adopt the proposed change. · Schools, conferences, and college sports associations: The underlying bill would set rules for their dealings with athletes and could allow qualifying schools to jointly sell some sports broadcast rights.

PARTY DYNAMICS

Democrats. The Democratic majority position was yes, and all 45 Democrats voted yes.

Republicans. The Republican majority position was no; Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine voted yes, against that majority position.

2 cross-party votes · 1 absence
MEMBERS · 100
OTHER VOTES ON THIS MEASURE

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...