Amendment sought to redirect $481,832,000 from the NATO Security Investment Program account to the Military Construction, Defense-Wide account.

May 15, 2026

OUTCOME · FAILED

80/ 413NEEDED 207

Threshold: Simple Majority

HEADS UP

Amendment, not the bill.This vote modifies the underlying bill but does not pass or reject the bill itself. The bill still needs a separate passage vote.

WHAT THIS VOTE DID

AI-written

The House rejected an amendment. The amendment received 80 yes votes and 333 no votes.

MORE DETAIL →

The House voted on whether to adopt an amendment, which would change the text of a bill under consideration. ChamberLight has not yet linked this roll call to the amendment or the bill it concerns, so its specific proposed change is not identified here. The amendment failed, so it did not change the bill’s text. This vote did not pass or reject the bill itself.

PROCEDURE

CATEGORY: amendment
NEEDED: Simple Majority
COALITION: bipartisan majority

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

The bill still needs a separate passage vote. This failed amendment vote did not decide whether the bill passes.

OPEN AMENDMENT →

PARTY DYNAMICS

Democrats. Democrats voted no: 205 no votes and 10 not voting.

Republicans. Republicans split, with 80 voting yes, 127 voting no, and 12 not voting; the party’s majority position was no. Aaron Bean of Florida, Abraham Hamadeh of Arizona, Andrew Clyde of Georgia, Andrew Ogles of Tennessee, Andy Biggs of Arizona, Anna Luna of Florida, Barry Moore of Alabama, and Ben Cline of Virginia voted yes, against their party’s majority position.

8 cross-party votes · Full attendance

MEMBERS · 435

AI-WRITTENThe summary and analysis of this vote were written by an AI model from the roll-call record.

Model: gpt-6-lunaMethod: Vote analysis, version 2.0Generated: Sep 25, 2026Confidence: Low

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...

Prev Next

VOTE FAILED· 119TH CONGRESS · 2ND SESSION · ROLL CALL #174

HouseAmendment

Amendment sought to redirect $481,832,000 from the NATO Security Investment Program account to the Military Construction, Defense-Wide account.

On Agreeing to the Amendment

May 15, 2026

80–333

207 to pass

Margin

253 votes

Short by

127 of 207

Crossed

80 members

HOW THIS VOTE WORKS

Bipartisan majority

The House voted on whether to add the amendment to the bill text being considered. This is separate from a vote to pass or reject the bill.

Threshold

207 of 413

Needs more yes than no votes — 207 of 413 cast this time. (435 total seats; members not voting don’t count toward the threshold.)

Outcome

Short by 127

The amendment failed, so it was not added to the bill. The bill itself was not passed or rejected by this vote.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

The bill still needs a separate passage vote. This failed amendment vote did not decide whether the bill passes.

PARTY DYNAMICS

The amendment failed, with 80 yes votes and 333 no votes. Republicans were split; Democrats and the one independent voter opposed it.

Democrats

Democrats voted no: 205 no votes and 10 not voting.

Republicans

Republicans split, with 80 voting yes, 127 voting no, and 12 not voting; the party’s majority position was no. Aaron Bean of Florida, Abraham Hamadeh of Arizona, Andrew Clyde of Georgia, Andrew Ogles of Tennessee, Andy Biggs of Arizona, Anna Luna of Florida, Barry Moore of Alabama, and Ben Cline of Virginia voted yes, against their party’s majority position.

Independents

The one independent voter voted no.

CROSSED PARTY LINES

R
Aaron BeanFlorida-4
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Abraham HamadehArizona-8
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Andrew ClydeGeorgia-9
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Andrew OglesTennessee-5
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Andy BiggsArizona-5
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Anna LunaFlorida-13
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Barry MooreAlabama-1
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.
R
Ben ClineVirginia-6
Voted YES against party majority— One of 80 Republicans who voted yes while most Republicans voted no.

AI-WRITTENThe summary and analysis of this vote were written by an AI model from the roll-call record.

Model: gpt-6-lunaMethod: Vote analysis, version 2.0Generated: Sep 25, 2026Confidence: Low

Amendment sought to redirect $481,832,000 from the NATO Security Investment Program account to the Military Construction, Defense-Wide account.

What do you think?

Discussion

Amendment sought to redirect $481,832,000 from the NATO Security Investment Program account to the Military Construction, Defense-Wide account.

WHAT HAPPENED

HOW THIS VOTE WORKS

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

PARTY DYNAMICS

PARTY BREAKDOWN

HOW MEMBERS VOTED

RELATED

What do you think?

Discussion

Search

Amendment sought to redirect $481,832,000 from the NATO Security Investment Program account to the Military Construction, Defense-Wide account.

What do you think?

Discussion

Amendment sought to redirect $481,832,000 from the NATO Security Investment Program account to the Military Construction, Defense-Wide account.

WHAT HAPPENED

HOW THIS VOTE WORKS

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

PARTY DYNAMICS

PARTY BREAKDOWN

HOW MEMBERS VOTED

RELATED

What do you think?

Discussion