Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate failed to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to end debate on S.Res. 377, effectively stalling the resolution through a bipartisan split.
This vote was a 'cloture' motion on S.Res. 377. In the Senate, cloture is a procedural move used to limit further discussion or stalling tactics on a piece of legislation or resolution. It is the primary way the Senate ends a filibuster and moves toward a final decision. Under Senate rules, ending debate on a resolution typically requires a supermajority of 60 votes rather than a simple majority. This ensures that a significant portion of the chamber agrees to move forward, preventing a slim majority from forcing immediate votes on controversial topics. The motion was rejected with 52 senators voting in favor and 47 against, falling eight votes short of the required 60. The vote was notably bipartisan, with significant portions of both the Democratic and Republican parties voting on each side. Because the motion failed, the Senate cannot move to a final vote on S.Res. 377 at this time.
The resolution remains on the Senate calendar, but without a successful cloture vote or a unanimous agreement to move forward, it cannot advance to final passage.
Why it matters. In the modern Senate, the failure of a cloture motion usually serves as a 'death knell' for a measure, as it indicates the supporters cannot muster the 60 votes necessary to overcome a filibuster.
Who’s affected. Senate Leadership: They must decide whether to attempt further negotiations or move on to other legislative priorities. · Sponsors of S.Res. 377: The sponsors now face a procedural dead-end unless they can convert eight more senators to their side.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus was majority-in-favor but divided, with 25 members supporting the motion and 20 opposing it.
Republicans. The Republican caucus was split almost exactly in half, with 26 members voting to end debate and 24 voting to continue it.
The Senate failed to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to end debate on S.Res.
377, effectively stalling the resolution through a bipartisan split.