Search people, articles, bills, and more
The House rejected H.Amdt. 68, which proposed cutting $350 million from the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026, for ARPA-E and moving the money to a debt-reduction account.
The House voted on H.Amdt. 68, an amendment to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026. It proposed cutting $350 million in funding for ARPA-E, a government energy research agency, and transferring that amount to an account for reducing the national debt. The amendment failed, with 77 voting yes and 347 voting no. The proposed cut and transfer were not adopted, so the ARPA-E funding remains in the bill for now.
The bill still needs a separate passage vote; this vote did not decide whether the bill passes.
OPEN AMENDMENT →Why it matters. The amendment would have shifted $350 million from energy research funding to a debt-reduction account. Because it failed, that proposed change was not made to the bill.
Who’s affected. ARPA-E and energy researchers: The proposed $350 million funding cut was not adopted, so the funding remains in the bill for now. · The bill's consideration: The bill was not passed or rejected by this amendment vote and still requires a separate passage vote.
Democrats. All 209 Democrats recorded on the question voted no; 6 did not vote.
Republicans. Republicans voted 77 yes and 138 no; 6 did not vote.
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Sep 3, 2025
The House rejected H.Amdt.
68, which proposed cutting $350 million from the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026, for ARPA-E and moving the money to a debt-reduction account.
An amendment vote decides whether to add a proposed change to the bill being considered. It does not pass or reject the bill itself, which requires a separate passage vote.
The bill still needs a separate passage vote; this vote did not decide whether the bill passes.
The amendment would have shifted $350 million from energy research funding to a debt-reduction account. Because it failed, that proposed change was not made to the bill.
Democrats voting on the amendment voted no. Republicans split, with more voting no than yes; eight Republicans listed as voting against their party's majority voted yes.
All 209 Democrats recorded on the question voted no; 6 did not vote.
Republicans voted 77 yes and 138 no; 6 did not vote.



















































