Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate rejected a motion to start debate on S.J.Res. 139, which would have overturned the EPA's rejection of Colorado's air quality plan. The proposal failed on a 46-52 party-line vote.
This vote concerned a "joint resolution of disapproval" aimed at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA had formally rejected Colorado's state plan for reducing "regional haze"—the smog that affects visibility in national parks and wilderness areas. S.J.Res. 139 sought to use the Congressional Review Act to cancel that EPA decision, effectively allowing Colorado's state-level plan to stand without federal interference. A "motion to proceed" is a procedural step in the Senate used to bring a bill or resolution to the floor for a full debate and a final vote. It is essentially a vote to decide whether the Senate should spend time discussing the matter. In this case, a simple majority of those voting was required to move forward. The motion failed 46-52, meaning the Senate will not move forward with this specific resolution at this time. The vote followed strict party lines, with Democrats and Independents voting to proceed and Republicans voting against it. As a result, the EPA's decision to reject Colorado's air quality plan remains in effect, likely leading to stricter federal oversight of the state's air pollution strategy.
The resolution remains on the Senate calendar, but without a successful motion to proceed, it is unlikely to advance further. The EPA's disapproval of the Colorado air plan stands.
OPEN BILL →Why it matters. This vote highlights the conflict between state-led environmental plans and federal oversight. It specifically impacts how smog and visibility are regulated in Colorado's iconic natural areas.
Who’s affected. Colorado Environmental Agencies: They must now deal with the EPA's rejection of their haze-reduction plan rather than moving forward under their own preferred strategy. · Industrial Facilities in Colorado: Businesses contributing to air pollution may face stricter federal requirements if the EPA imposes its own plan. · National Park Visitors: Future air quality and visibility in scenic areas like Rocky Mountain National Park depend on whether the federal or state plan eventually takes effect.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus, along with two Independents, voted unanimously to move forward with the resolution.
Republicans. The Republican caucus voted unanimously to block the motion to proceed.
On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 139
Apr 29, 2026
The Senate rejected a motion to start debate on S.J.Res.
139, which would have overturned the EPA's rejection of Colorado's air quality plan. The proposal failed on a 46-52 party-line vote.
This was a vote to begin formal consideration of the resolution. Under the Congressional Review Act, the Senate must first vote to "proceed" to the measure before they can debate it or hold a final vote on whether to pass it.
The resolution remains on the Senate calendar, but without a successful motion to proceed, it is unlikely to advance further. The EPA's disapproval of the Colorado air plan stands.
This vote highlights the conflict between state-led environmental plans and federal oversight. It specifically impacts how smog and visibility are regulated in Colorado's iconic natural areas.
The vote was entirely split along party lines, with Democrats supporting the start of the debate and Republicans blocking it.
The Democratic caucus, along with two Independents, voted unanimously to move forward with the resolution.
The Republican caucus voted unanimously to block the motion to proceed.
Both Independent members voted with the Democrats to proceed.