Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate voted 54-46 to begin considering John Ratcliffe’s nomination to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The motion passed; it was not a vote to confirm him.
The Senate voted on whether to begin formal consideration of John Ratcliffe’s nomination to lead the Central Intelligence Agency. A motion to proceed is an early procedural step, not a decision on the nominee’s qualifications or confirmation. The Senate agreed to proceed, 54-46. That allowed the nomination to move forward for further consideration, but did not itself confirm Ratcliffe.
The Senate later voted to confirm Ratcliffe on January 23, 2025.
Why it matters. The motion cleared an early step in the Senate’s consideration of a nominee to lead the CIA. It did not itself give Ratcliffe the position.
Who’s affected. Central Intelligence Agency: The nomination concerned who would serve as the agency’s director. · John Ratcliffe: The vote advanced his nomination for further Senate consideration.
Democrats. One Democrat voted yes and 44 voted no; the Democratic majority position was no.
Republicans. All 53 Republicans voted yes; the Republican majority position was yes.
Jan 21, 2025
The Senate voted 54-46 to begin considering John Ratcliffe’s nomination to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
The motion passed; it was not a vote to confirm him.
A motion to proceed asks the Senate to start formal consideration of a matter. It is a procedural hurdle, separate from a final vote on a nomination.
The Senate later voted to confirm Ratcliffe on January 23, 2025.
The motion cleared an early step in the Senate’s consideration of a nominee to lead the CIA. It did not itself give Ratcliffe the position.
The vote followed the parties’ majority positions: Republicans mostly voted yes, while Democrats mostly voted no. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the one Democrat listed as voting against his party’s majority position.
One Democrat voted yes and 44 voted no; the Democratic majority position was no.
All 53 Republicans voted yes; the Republican majority position was yes.
Both independents voted no.