Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate rejected a motion to waive applicable budgetary discipline for Hassan Amendment No. 5535. The motion received 46 yes votes and 52 no votes, below the required 60.
The Senate voted on whether to waive applicable budgetary discipline in connection with Hassan Amendment No. 5535. ChamberLight has not yet linked this roll call to the measure it concerns, so the amendment’s subject is not described here. The motion was rejected, so the requested waiver was not granted.
The waiver request is resolved: it was rejected. The roll-call facts do not specify a further action on the amendment.
Why it matters. The vote determined whether applicable budgetary discipline would be waived for the amendment; it did not decide the amendment’s merits.
Who’s affected. Senators considering the amendment: The requested waiver was denied, so the applicable budgetary discipline remained in place.
Democrats. 44 Democrats voted yes and 1 did not vote; the Democratic majority position was yes.
Republicans. All 52 Republicans who voted opposed the motion, and 1 did not vote; the Republican majority position was no.
Jun 4, 2026
The Senate rejected a motion to waive applicable budgetary discipline for Hassan Amendment No.
5535. The motion received 46 yes votes and 52 no votes, below the required 60.
This was a procedural vote on whether to set aside budgetary rules for the amendment, not a vote to adopt the amendment itself. The motion needed 60 votes in the Senate and received 46.
The waiver request is resolved: it was rejected. The roll-call facts do not specify a further action on the amendment.
The vote determined whether applicable budgetary discipline would be waived for the amendment; it did not decide the amendment’s merits.
The vote followed party majority positions: Democrats and the two independents voted yes, while Republicans voted no.
44 Democrats voted yes and 1 did not vote; the Democratic majority position was yes.
All 52 Republicans who voted opposed the motion, and 1 did not vote; the Republican majority position was no.
Both independents voted yes.