Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate agreed to limit debate on Sheria Akins Clarke’s nomination to be a U.S. district judge in South Carolina, voting 57-38. This was a vote on debate, not on whether to confirm her.
The Senate voted on a cloture motion concerning Sheria Akins Clarke’s nomination to be a U.S. District Judge for the District of South Carolina. The motion was agreed to, 57-38. That result addressed debate on the nomination, not the confirmation decision itself.
The Senate held a separate confirmation vote on the nomination on the same date and confirmed Clarke, 52-38.
Why it matters. Cloture allowed the Senate to move toward a separate decision on filling a federal judgeship in South Carolina. The nominee was later confirmed.
Who’s affected. Federal courts in South Carolina: Clarke was nominated to serve as a U.S. District Judge in the state. · Sheria Akins Clarke: The Senate later confirmed her in a separate vote.
Democrats. Eight Democrats voted yes, contrary to their party’s majority position of no; 36 voted no and 1 did not vote.
Republicans. Forty-nine Republicans voted yes, consistent with their party’s majority position; 4 did not vote.
The Senate agreed to limit debate on Sheria Akins Clarke’s nomination to be a U.S.
district judge in South Carolina, voting 57-38. This was a vote on debate, not on whether to confirm her.
Cloture is a Senate vote to limit debate and move toward a later vote on the matter. For this nomination, 48 of the 95 senators who voted yes or no were needed; 57 voted yes, so the motion passed.
The Senate held a separate confirmation vote on the nomination on the same date and confirmed Clarke, 52-38.
Cloture allowed the Senate to move toward a separate decision on filling a federal judgeship in South Carolina. The nominee was later confirmed.
The motion passed with votes from both parties: 49 Republicans and 8 Democrats voted yes, while 36 Democrats and 2 independents voted no.
Eight Democrats voted yes, contrary to their party’s majority position of no; 36 voted no and 1 did not vote.
Forty-nine Republicans voted yes, consistent with their party’s majority position; 4 did not vote.
Both independents who voted opposed the motion.