Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate voted to kill a proposed amendment (S.Amdt. 4286) to H.R. 7148. By a 58-42 vote, the chamber decided to set the proposal aside permanently without voting on its merits.
This vote was on a "Motion to Table" a specific change (Amendment 4286) proposed for the bill H.R. 7148. When a proposal is "tabled," it is effectively discarded. This means the Senate will not consider that specific change any further while debating this piece of legislation. A "Motion to Table" is a procedural tactic used to stop a proposal immediately. Unlike a direct "Yes" or "No" vote on the idea itself, a vote to "table" is a vote to put the matter on the table permanently, which kills it. It is a common way for a majority to dispose of controversial or secondary proposals quickly to move on to other business. Because the motion succeeded with 58 votes, the amendment is dead and will not be added to the bill. The Senate will continue its work on the main bill without this specific addition. The vote showed a rare bipartisan split, with members of both the Democratic and Republican parties divided on whether to keep the proposal alive.
The Senate will proceed with further debate or consideration of other amendments on the underlying bill, H.R. 7148.
Why it matters. This vote determined whether a specific policy change would be part of the larger bill. By killing the amendment, the Senate simplified the path for the main legislation and prevented a direct vote on the amendment's merits.
Who’s affected. Legislative sponsors: The authors of Amendment 4286 saw their proposal rejected before it could receive a direct vote on its content.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus was narrowly in favor of killing the amendment, with 25 members voting yes and 20 voting no.
Republicans. The Republican caucus was also divided but leaned toward killing the amendment, with 29 members voting yes and 22 voting no.
The Senate voted to kill a proposed amendment (S.Amdt.
4286) to H.R. 7148. By a 58-42 vote, the chamber decided to set the proposal aside permanently without voting on its merits.