Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate rejected a motion to discard an amendment to S. 1582. This allows the Senate to continue debating the amendment rather than killing it immediately.
Senators voted on a procedural motion to 'table' Amendment 2310, which was proposed for the bill S. 1582. A motion to table is a defensive legislative tactic used to permanently dispose of a proposal without having to hold a direct vote on its merits. If the motion had succeeded, the amendment would have been effectively killed. In the Senate, a motion to table is often used to quickly clear the floor of controversial or unwanted proposals. Because this motion failed, the amendment remains 'on the table' in a literal sense, meaning it is still active and eligible for further debate and a future vote on whether to adopt it into the bill. The vote failed 45-52, which is a relatively close margin for a procedural move. The result was bipartisan, with significant numbers of both Democrats and Republicans voting against the motion to keep the amendment alive. The Senate will now move forward with further consideration of the proposal.
The Senate will continue to debate Amendment 2310 and may eventually hold a direct vote on whether to add it to the final bill.
Why it matters. A failed motion to table indicates that there is enough interest in an amendment to force a debate on its actual substance rather than dismissing it procedurally.
Who’s affected. Senate Leadership: The failure to table means leadership must allocate more floor time to debate this specific amendment.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus mostly voted 'no,' preferring to keep the amendment under consideration.
Republicans. The Republican caucus was split, with a slight majority voting 'no' to allow the amendment to proceed.
The Senate rejected a motion to discard an amendment to S.
1582. This allows the Senate to continue debating the amendment rather than killing it immediately.