Search people, articles, bills, and more
Lawmakers rejected a change to the rules for debating a major surveillance bill. The underlying legislation, H.R. 8035, would extend the government's authority to monitor foreign communications until October 2027. This specific amendment failed, meaning the debate moved forward without the proposed modification.
This vote was about a proposed change to the procedures for debating a bill to extend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The underlying bill, H.R. 8035, aims to keep a controversial spying program active until late 2027. This program allows the government to collect digital communications from foreigners overseas, but it often sweeps up the data of Americans in the process, leading to intense debates over privacy rights. This was a vote on an amendment to a "rule." In the House, a rule is essentially a guidebook for how a specific bill will be handled, determining which changes can be made and how long members can talk. When a member proposes an amendment to the rule, they are trying to change those guidelines—for example, by forcing a vote on a privacy protection that wasn't originally included. If the amendment passes, the rule is updated; if it fails, the House sticks to the original plan. The amendment failed to pass, with 220 members voting against it and 200 voting in favor. This outcome means the House decided not to change its plan for how the surveillance bill would be handled. Following this vote, the House continued toward a final decision on whether to extend the government's spying authorities without the specific changes proposed in this amendment.
Lawmakers rejected a change to the rules for debating a major surveillance bill.
The underlying legislation, H.R. 8035, would extend the government's authority to monitor foreign communications until October 2027. This specific amendment failed, meaning the debate moved forward without the proposed modification.