Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate rejected a motion to waive budget rules for Amendment No. 233, sponsored by Senator Van Hollen. The 49-51 vote failed to meet the required threshold, effectively blocking the amendment from further consideration.
This vote concerned a procedural motion to bypass Senate budget rules for an amendment proposed by Senator Chris Van Hollen. Budget rules are designed to restrict legislation or amendments that would increase the federal deficit or exceed agreed-upon spending limits. To move forward with a proposal that violates these rules, the Senate must first agree to set them aside via a waiver. In the Senate, a 'Motion to Waive Budgetary Discipline' serves as a fiscal gatekeeper. If a senator objects that a proposal breaks spending rules, the sponsor must secure a supermajority of support to proceed. If the motion fails, the amendment is typically ruled 'out of order,' meaning it cannot be voted on or added to the underlying bill. The motion was rejected with 49 senators in favor and 51 against. Because the motion did not reach the necessary level of support, the amendment was blocked. The vote was notable for its lack of party unity, as both the Democratic and Republican caucuses were nearly evenly split on whether to allow the amendment to move forward.
The amendment is set aside, and the Senate will proceed with other business or remaining amendments on the legislative calendar.
Why it matters. This vote reinforces Senate fiscal discipline by upholding budget rules against a specific policy proposal that would have exceeded spending targets.
Who’s affected. Taxpayers: The rejection of the waiver prevents potential new spending that was not accounted for in the existing budget framework.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus was divided, with 21 members voting yes and 24 voting no.
Republicans. The Republican caucus was also split, with 25 members voting yes and 26 voting no.
Feb 21, 2025
The Senate rejected a motion to waive budget rules for Amendment No.
233, sponsored by Senator Van Hollen. The 49-51 vote failed to meet the required threshold, effectively blocking the amendment from further consideration.