Skip to main content
Updated
Adam SmithD · WA-9
How outlets cover Smith · Jan 5 – Jan 6, 2026

Adam Smith Comments on U.S. Operation in Venezuela

So far two center outlets have covered this. No left- or right-leaning outlet has picked it up yet.

ARTICLES
2
OUTLETS
2
AVG CRED
83HIGH
AVG BAL
60SOME TILT

Community verdict

37 VOTES
How does this story look for
Adam Smith D · WA-9
● OPEN
tl;drFROM THE LEAD ARTICLE · UNION-BULLETIN

After U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Washington Reps. Michael Baumgartner and Adam Smith offered sharply different views of the operation, its legality and its likely consequences. Their disagreement centers on executive war powers and the risks of what comes next in Venezuela.

Outlets by lean

2 RATED

Compare by side

2 CENTER ARTICLES
NPRJAN 6 · 3:00 PM ET
Trump admin's Venezuela strategy 'vague,' says Rep. Adam Smith : NPRSmith questioned the administration’s Venezuela strategy and argued that the operation violated international and U.S. law.CRED 89BAL 45 PORTRAYS SMITH: NEUTRAL
Union-Bulletin (cites Spokesman.com)JAN 5 · 3:45 PM ET
Congressmen Michael Baumgartner, Adam Smith react after U.S. military attacks Venezuela, captures its presidentSmith argued the strike lacked a sufficient threat justification and could deepen instability while concentrating power in the executive branch.CRED 76BAL 75 PORTRAYS SMITH: NEUTRAL

How outlets portrayed Smith

Each article counts once, however many sites carried it. Sides are each outlet’s published lean. How portrayal is read

Left: 0 favorable, 0 critical, 0 mixed, 0 neutral. Center: 0 favorable, 0 critical, 0 mixed, 2 neutral. Right: 0 favorable, 0 critical, 0 mixed, 0 neutral.

When each side covered it

Articles per day by side. JAN 5: Left 0, Center 1, Right 0. JAN 6: Left 0, Center 1, Right 0.

NO LEFT OR RIGHT COVERAGE YET

Legislation in this story

1 BILL
FOLLOW THIS STORY

Only center outlets have covered this. We’ll alert you when a left- or right-leaning outlet does.