Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 24, 2026  UPDATED OCT 5
H.R. 10569HOUSE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119TH

Protecting Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing as Critical Infrastructure Act

Assigns CISA added responsibility for protecting biotechnology and biomanufacturing infrastructure that lacks a designated sector-specific agency.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the House Homeland Security Committee since Sept. 24, 2026, 12 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 24, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. HOUSEHOUSE—
  4. SENATESENATE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 4 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Biotechnology and biomanufacturing infrastructure needs protection from threats that could disrupt its operations. The bill would give the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency specific responsibilities for protecting these areas when no sector-specific agency is designated. It would also require stakeholder planning, risk assessments, and reports on implementation and remaining protection gaps.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 4 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN HOUSE
  1. Expand CISA’s protection role

    The bill would give the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) specific duties to protect biotechnology and biomanufacturing infrastructure that has no designated Sector-Specific Agency. Those duties include providing technical assistance and outreach to owners and operators.

  2. Include sectors in security planning

    CISA would assess risks to biotechnology and biomanufacturing infrastructure in coordination with relevant Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations and industry associations. National strategic plans would include these sectors and draw on the assessments.

  3. Plan stakeholder outreach

    CISA would identify stakeholders, inform them about any protection they already receive through existing critical infrastructure sectors, and plan for their representation in relevant consortia and sector coordinating councils.

  4. Report on implementation and gaps

    CISA would report to congressional homeland security committees on its work plan and its implementation, and assess whether any critical biotechnology areas remain unprotected.

THE CONTEXT

The bill’s stated purpose is to protect biotechnology and biomanufacturing infrastructure. It would make CISA’s role in protecting these areas explicit when no Sector-Specific Agency is designated, and require an assessment of whether any critical biotechnology areas remain unprotected.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
45 DAYS AFTER ENACTMENT
CISA submits a stakeholder and protection work plan
BY SEP. 30, 2027
CISA updates strategic plans with stakeholder input
ONE YEAR AFTER SUBMITTING THE WORK PLAN
CISA reports on implementation of its work plan
EARLIER OF TWO YEARS AFTER THE WORK PLAN OR THE FIRST QUALIFYING EVALUATION AFTER ENACTMENT
CISA reports on remaining unprotected critical biotechnology areas
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. IHIntroduced in HouseSEP 24, 2026666
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 24, 2026
    HOUSE
    SEP 24, 2026
    By Rep. Khanna with 2 original cosponsors
    Referred to Homeland Security
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    House committeeSEP 24, 2026
    HOMELAND SECURITY NOW
    SEP 24, 2026
    In committee for 12 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 12 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. Senate committee—
    SENATE
    —
  5. Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026REFERREDHOUSEReferred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
  2. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026INTRODUCEDHOUSEIntroduced in House
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE118 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 12, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
ITS TWINTHE SAME IDEA IN THE OTHER CHAMBER
H.R. 10569INTRO: Done, COMM.: Now, HOUSE: Not yet, SENATE: Not yet, LAW: Not yetIN COMMITTEE
S. 5502INTRO: Done, COMM.: Now, SENATE: Not yet, HOUSE: Not yet, LAW: Not yetIN COMMITTEE

In committee · Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · 1 cosponsor · introduced by Maggie Hassan.

S. 5502 is the same bill introduced in the Senate. Companion bills let both chambers work on one idea at once; when one passes, the other chamber often takes up the version that already passed.

OPEN S. 5502 →
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

WHO’S BEHIND IT · 2 COSPONSORS

A coalition from 2 states

PARTY MIX
1 REPUBLICAN1 DEMOCRAT

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. The smaller side has 1 member.

COSPONSORS BY STATEEACH BAR IS THE SHARE OF THE STATE’S HOUSE MEMBERS
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
PR
DEMOCRATDEMREPUBLICANREPINDEPENDENTINDSPONSORNOT A COSPONSORNONE
PARTY MIX
1 REPUBLICAN1 DEMOCRAT

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. The smaller side has 1 member.

MOMENTUM
SEP 2026 · 2 ORIGINALNOW · 2

Rep. Khanna’s record: sponsored 52 bills this Congress. 2 passed the House; 1 became law.

EVERY COSPONSOR · IN THE ORDER THEY JOINED2 ACTIVE
READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the House, or is signed into law.