"By Any Means Necessary": Candidate Struck From Alaska Ballot Over Alleged Democratic Dirty Trick
The article says a candidate with the same name was disqualified amid concerns that voters could confuse him with the senator.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYZeroHedge is a blog with a strongly partisan reputation, and the page’s byline information is inconsistent. The article attributes the disqualification rationale to an election official but offers little sourcing or response from those accused.
- Source type — A blog publisher with a partisan presentation rather than a broadly established newsroom.
- Editorial standards — The article relies on charged characterizations and does not include a response from the accused parties.
- Author attribution — The page metadata names Tyler Durden, while the text credits Jonathan Turley.
The article cites an election official’s conclusion and describes indicators cited in the disqualification, but it largely advances an accusation without responses from the candidate, Peltola or Democratic organizations. Its language is openly evaluative, and it provides little independent corroboration.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story reports the election director’s conclusion but does not include responses from the teacher, Peltola or Democratic organizations. Its repeated assertions of a partisan scheme dominate the account.
- Counterarguments presented — The article speculates about a possible appeal but gives no response from the candidate or other accused parties.
- Source diversity — The article offers no attributed account from the teacher, Peltola or Democratic representatives.
- Loaded language — Uses repeated condemnatory language to describe the alleged conduct.
The article frames the episode as Democratic misconduct, repeatedly uses the term “dirty trick,” and questions Democratic leaders’ commitment to democracy. It presents no comparable criticism of Republicans or substantive response from the accused side.
- Language tone — Repeatedly uses accusatory terms such as “dirty trick” and “disgraceful.”
- Framing — Frames the candidacy as a Democratic effort to manipulate the Senate race.
- Source selection — Relies on the election official’s findings and the author’s assertions, without a response from the accused parties.
An Alaska election official disqualified retired teacher Dan J. Sullivan from the ballot after concluding his candidacy was intended to confuse voters in the Senate race between Sen. Dan Sullivan and Mary Peltola. The article presents the alleged scheme as involving Democratic operatives but does not establish Peltola’s personal role.
The article reports that Alaska Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher disqualified retired teacher Dan J. Sullivan, whose name matched that of Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan. Beecher concluded that the teacher’s candidacy was filed to confuse or mislead voters. The article says the teacher used the name Dan Sullivan on the ballot, had not registered as a Republican before launching his Senate campaign, and had a website resembling the incumbent’s campaign materials.
The article characterizes the candidacy as a suspected effort to divide the incumbent’s vote and alleges connections to Democratic operatives and a consultant who had supported Peltola. It raises questions about Peltola’s role, the DNC’s role and the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee’s role, but does not report evidence establishing that any of them encouraged the candidacy.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Sullivan in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Sullivan’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Alaska senator whose Senate race is the apparent target of the alleged ballot confusion
Alaska Senate candidate and alleged beneficiary of the ballot confusion
Part of a bigger story
35 OUTLETSAlaska’s elections director ruled Dan J. Sullivan, a same-name Republican challenger to Sen. Dan Sullivan, ineligible for the August Senate primary ballot, finding his candidacy was intended to confuse voters. Left-leaning outlets center the ruling and its stated voter-confusion rationale. Center outlets report the official’s finding alongside the challenger’s denial, appeal options and concerns about ballot access. Right-leaning outlets frame the ruling as a win against an alleged Democratic effort to confuse voters and help the incumbent’s opponent.
- ARTICLES
- 46
- OUTLETS
- 35
- AVG CRED
- 69
- HotAir · Yukon-a Be Kidding Me: Alaska Bounces Dem Dirty Trick From Senate Primary
- Yahoo News · Same-name candidate disqualified from key Senate race over alleged Dem scheme to confuse voters
- JONATHAN TURLEY · "By Any Means Necessary": Candidate Struck from Alaska Ballot Over Alleged Democratic Dirty Trick
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

