Sen. Lindsey Graham held up shutdown deal over provision letting him and others sue DOJ
Graham delayed the funding vote over repeal of a provision allowing senators to sue over access to their phone records.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Yahoo News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The page identifies NBC News as the original publisher, an established newsroom with professional reporting and editorial practices. Yahoo republishes the report with attribution, so the credibility assessment reflects the reporting outlet rather than Yahoo's own original reporting.
- Source type — The article is attributed to NBC News, an established national newsroom.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Transparency — The page explicitly says the article was originally published on NBCNews.com.
- Editorial standards — The reporting includes direct quotations and describes the legislative sequence, though no corrections information is provided here.
The report supplies procedural context and direct quotations from Graham, and it identifies the House and Senate actions involved. Its account relies heavily on Graham’s statements and gives limited space to other perspectives on the disputed provision or the funding agreement.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The report provides relevant background on the provision and the funding negotiations, but Graham’s case receives most of the quoted attention. It offers little direct explanation from lawmakers who supported repeal or other parties to the negotiations.
- Counterarguments presented — The story explains that the provision prompted bipartisan House outrage but does not include direct arguments from its critics.
- Source diversity — Most direct quotations come from Graham, with limited perspectives from other participants.
- Loaded language — Strong language is mostly attributed to Graham rather than adopted by the reporter.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is written as a news report and distinguishes quotations from reported events.
The report uses largely factual language, attributes Graham’s arguments to him, and describes both the provision and the funding negotiations without an evident partisan framing.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral descriptions, with charged terms presented as direct quotations.
- Source selection — Graham is extensively quoted; the procedural account also includes actions by House and Senate negotiators.
- Framing — The headline and story focus on Graham’s role in delaying the deal and his objection to repeal.
Republished with credit
Republished from NBC News, with credit to the original publisher.
360 stories · 84.9–85.2 · updated Oct 12, 2026
This is NBC News's own score, and this article is credited to NBC News. The host score in the Source Check is Yahoo News's.
Sen. Lindsey Graham delayed a Senate vote on a government funding deal while objecting to repeal of a provision that let senators sue over unnotified access to their phone records. He later lifted his hold conditionally, seeking votes on other measures and a place in DHS negotiations.
President Donald Trump and Senate Democrats reached a deal to fund most of the government for the rest of the year, but Graham blocked a speedy Senate vote. He called the agreement a “bad deal” for DHS personnel and objected to language repealing a provision that could let him and other senators sue the Justice Department over phone-record subpoenas. Graham said senators should be notified when their records are sought and should be able to go to court if they believe the records were illegally obtained.
The House had removed the provision from its funding package, and Senate negotiators included its repeal in a short-term DHS funding bill. By Friday morning, Graham said he was lifting his hold if he received a promised vote on his sanctuary cities bill and a vote within a reasonable time on a revised version of the provision. He also criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for repealing it without consulting him and said he wanted a role in the next round of DHS negotiations.
Community verdict
11 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 60
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 56% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator who held up the funding vote over repeal of the lawsuit provision
House Speaker who led the repeal of the provision in the House package
Self-funding Republican Senate candidate challenging Graham
President who reached a funding deal with Senate Democrats
Representative whose phone records were accessed in the investigation
Official named in Graham’s question about responsibility for DHS issues
Senate Minority Leader who negotiated the funding deal with Trump
Republican Senate candidate challenging Graham in the primary
Part of a bigger story
15 OUTLETSOutlets agree Lindsey Graham delayed a Senate funding package while pressing for changes, then lifted his hold after assurances of later votes on his proposals. Left-leaning outlets portray the hold as Graham risking a shutdown to preserve senators’ ability to sue over phone-record searches. Center outlets mainly track his hold, the votes he sought and the negotiations that led him to lift it. Right-leaning outlets foreground his demands on sanctuary cities, immigration enforcement and investigations, while one article criticizes him for risking a shutdown.
- ARTICLES
- 60
- OUTLETS
- 15
- AVG CRED
- 65
- Yahoo News · Lindsey Graham Goes on Bizarre Rambling Rant Before Hannity Steps In: 'I Think You're Pretty…Jacked Up!'
- Attack of the Fanboy · 'You jammed me': Lindsey Graham ends shutdown threat but warns top Republican 'I won't forget this'
- Go Watertown · Graham lifts hold on government funding deal with just hours to shutdown deadline
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…







