Kelly says he'll 'do everything in my power' to stop demotion threat
Hegseth backed away from court-martial threats but said he had censured Kelly and begun proceedings to demote him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Yahoo News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The reporting is attributed to USA TODAY, an established national news organization with newsroom standards. Yahoo identifies the article as originally appearing at USA TODAY, so the assessment reflects the reporting source rather than independent Yahoo reporting.
- Source type — Established national news organization is the credited reporting source.
- Author attribution — A named USA TODAY reporter is credited.
- Transparency — The page identifies USA TODAY as the article’s original publisher.
The article gives attributed interview remarks, describes the Pentagon’s actions and explains the relevant administrative process. Its account relies heavily on Kelly’s interview and does not include a direct response from Hegseth or the Pentagon.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Kelly’s response, the actions attributed to Hegseth and context about the demotion process. It does not provide a direct account from Hegseth or the Pentagon, leaving Kelly’s perspective more prominent.
- Counterarguments presented — Hegseth’s actions are described, but his perspective on the censure and proceedings is not directly presented.
- Source diversity — Kelly is the central interview source; legal and procedural context broadens the report.
- Loaded language — Critical descriptions are attributed to Kelly and Stewart rather than stated as the reporter’s judgment.
The article reports the dispute in straightforward language and attributes evaluative remarks to Kelly and Jon Stewart. No clear editorial framing favors a political side.
- Language tone — The narration is largely factual; sharper descriptions appear in attributed quotations.
- Source selection — Kelly is interviewed, while Hegseth’s actions are reported without a direct response from him.
- Framing — The article centers Kelly’s response but also describes the administrative process and preceding events.
Republished with credit
Republished from USA Today, with credit to the original publisher.
21 stories · 79–81 · updated Oct 11, 2026
This is USA Today's own score, and this article is credited to USA Today. The host score in the Source Check is Yahoo News's.
Mark Kelly said he would fight Pentagon proceedings to demote him in retirement after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth censured him. Kelly argued the dispute also concerns freedom of speech.
On Jan. 5, Sen. Mark Kelly said on “The Daily Show” that he would do everything in his power to stop the Defense Department from demoting him in retirement. The comments followed Hegseth’s decision to censure Kelly and begin administrative proceedings, while backing away from earlier court-martial threats related to a video about service members refusing illegal orders.
Kelly said the dispute was “not just about me” and argued that the government cannot stifle people’s freedom of speech. The article says the demotion process considers an officer’s active-duty conduct and that it is unclear how the Navy can use Kelly’s post-retirement conduct in its determination. It also says Navy Secretary John Phelan decides the retired rank of officers below vice admiral.
Community verdict
24 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 40
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Defense secretary who censured Kelly and began administrative proceedings to demote him
Senator responding to the Pentagon’s proceedings to demote him in retirement
Kelly's version of this story ↗President whose comments about the lawmakers and Kelly are recounted
Part of a bigger story
38 OUTLETSOutlets report that Hegseth issued a censure to Sen. Mark Kelly and opened proceedings that could reduce his retired military rank or pay. The action followed Kelly’s participation in a video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders. Left-leaning outlets largely cast the action as punishment for Kelly’s speech and a bid to silence him. Center outlets emphasize the censure and possible consequences while presenting Kelly’s response and, in some reports, legal or political questions. Right-leaning outlets, especially PJ Media, frame the proceedings as accountability for statements they portray as harmful to military discipline.
- ARTICLES
- 40
- OUTLETS
- 38
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


