Fox Anchor Throws Down With Democrat Over His PSA Warning Troops Not to Follow 'Illegal Orders'
Crow defended a public service announcement reminding service members not to follow unlawful orders.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Yahoo News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
Yahoo News is an established national publisher, but this article identifies itself as first appearing on Mediaite, so the reporting originates with another outlet. The named author and attribution support transparency, though the piece is primarily a report of a televised exchange.
- Source type — Yahoo News is an established national news publisher.
- Author attribution — The article names Alex Griffing and identifies Mediaite as the original publisher.
- Editorial standards — The story attributes the competing claims to the participants, but offers limited independent reporting or context.
The article provides a detailed account of both sides of the televised exchange and attributes their claims. It relies almost entirely on the interview, with little independent verification or context for the claims about military activity and service-member training.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives substantial space to Crow’s defense and MacCallum’s concerns, and includes Schmitt’s criticism. It offers little context or independent evidence to assess the claims they make.
- Counterarguments presented — Crow’s defense and MacCallum’s objections are both presented in detail.
- Source diversity — The perspectives come from the interview participants, with Schmitt’s statement quoted; no independent expert or documentary source is included.
- Omitted context — The report gives limited background for evaluating the claims about military orders and overseas deployments.
The report presents Crow’s defense and MacCallum’s objections, attributing critical claims to their speakers. Its account of the exchange does not clearly endorse either side.
- Language tone — The story uses some lively descriptions of the exchange, but largely reports what each participant said.
- Source selection — Both Crow and MacCallum speak at length, and Schmitt’s criticism is quoted.
- Framing — The story is organized around a televised debate rather than an argument for either position.
Republished with credit
Republished from Mediaite, with credit to the original publisher.
1,140 stories · 64.7–65.0 · updated Oct 13, 2026
This is Mediaite's own score, and this article is credited to Mediaite. The host score in the Source Check is Yahoo News's.
Rep. Jason Crow defended a public service announcement urging service members not to follow unlawful orders during a Fox News exchange. He said the military must understand its legal obligations and criticized the Trump administration’s use of military force without congressional approval.
Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum pressed Rep. Jason Crow to identify a specific illegal order by President Trump. Crow defended the announcement, saying it reminded service members of their obligations under federal law and the Constitution. He also argued that the administration had expanded military use overseas without congressional approval.
MacCallum said the announcement was too vague and could confuse service members. She also quoted Sen. Eric Schmitt, who called the lawmakers’ message “subversive to democracy-ish.” Crow rejected that characterization and said service members were capable of understanding a reminder about lawful orders.
Community verdict
5 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 4
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 50% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →President discussed in connection with the disputed orders and military use
Senator quoted criticizing the lawmakers’ announcement
Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSOutlets agree Trump accused Democratic lawmakers of sedition after their video urged service members to refuse illegal orders, with Crow involved in the dispute. Center outlets focus on Crow defending the warning’s legal basis and lawmakers’ protection after Trump’s remarks. Right-leaning outlets portray the protection requests as overreaction and note Crow asked police to investigate Trump’s posts.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 60
- redstate.com · Did Democrats Seriously Call the Capitol Police on Trump for Accusing Them of Sedition?
- Al Jazeera · Why has Trump blasted US Democrats for 'seditious' comments? | Donald Trump News
- Daily Mail · Defiant Dems receive 24/7 protection from Capitol Police after Trump accused them of 'seditious behavior' and threatened them with execution
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






