Congress to vote on releasing more Epstein files. Live updates
Khanna co-authored the bill and said survivors helped draft its protections for victims.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Yahoo News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The article is attributed to USA TODAY reporters and identifies USA TODAY as the original publisher. Yahoo News is an established national news platform, while the reporting credit belongs to the established originating newsroom.
- Source type — Published by a national news platform and attributed to USA TODAY reporting.
- Author attribution — Six reporters are named, with USA TODAY identified alongside their bylines.
- Transparency — The page identifies the original publisher and includes attributed statements and quotes.
- Editorial standards — The originating newsroom is an established national outlet; no article-specific corrections information is shown.
The live updates include named lawmakers, direct quotations, the bill's limits, and accounts from survivors and other observers. The article presents multiple positions, though it offers limited independent detail on the bill's implementation and the privacy objections.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes supporters' arguments, privacy concerns, the president's position, lawmakers' responses, and survivors' views. It gives less detail to the case against releasing records than to arguments for transparency.
- Counterarguments presented — Privacy concerns and the possibility of withholding material that could affect investigations are reported.
- Source diversity — Quotes and accounts come from lawmakers, survivors, and a former White House lawyer.
- Omitted context — The article gives limited detail on the substance of the privacy objections and the bill's likely application.
- Loaded language — Some descriptions of Trump's conduct and the vote's political meaning are pointed, but most updates are attributed or factual.
The report is largely factual and includes statements from supporters and opponents of the measure, but its framing emphasizes the vote as a rebuke to Trump and describes his reaction critically.
- Framing — The opening characterizes the vote as a rebuke to Trump and his about-face.
- Language tone — Mostly straightforward reporting, with some pointed descriptions of Trump's response.
- Source selection — Includes lawmakers on both sides, survivors, and a former White House lawyer.
Republished with credit
Republished from USA Today, with credit to the original publisher.
21 stories · 79–81 · updated Oct 13, 2026
This is USA Today's own score, and this article is credited to USA Today. The host score in the Source Check is Yahoo News's.
The House and Senate passed a bill requiring the Justice Department to release Epstein-related records, with one House member voting against it and unanimous Senate support. The vote followed bipartisan pressure on President Trump, who said he would sign the bill.
Congress passed a measure requiring the Justice Department to release as much information as possible about Jeffrey Epstein. The House had one dissenting vote, while the Senate supported the bill unanimously; the bill allows some information to be withheld to protect victims or active investigations. Trump said he was prepared to sign it.
Representative Ro Khanna, a co-author, said survivors helped draft the measure and that it protects victims. Speaker Mike Johnson, who had opposed the measure, said he would vote for it. Representative Clay Higgins cast the sole House vote against it, citing privacy concerns.
Community verdict
34 VOTES
Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 19
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →
Speaker of the House who defended the process and voted for the bill
Johnson's version of this story ↗
President whose position on the bill and comments about its release are reported
Trump's version of this story ↗
The sole House member to vote against the bill
Attorney general whom a former White House lawyer predicted could cite investigations as grounds to withhold records
Former president mentioned in Johnson's criticism of Democrats
Co-author of the bill
Senate majority leader commenting on the bill's expected progress
Representative commenting on whether the Justice Department would release the files
Senate minority leader commenting on taking up the bill
Part of a bigger story
16 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Khanna worked with Thomas Massie and other lawmakers to advance a bill requiring the Justice Department to release Epstein-related records, and that the House passed it. Left-leaning outlets examine whether the vote could raise Khanna’s profile and scrutinize his claims of cross-party influence. Center outlets focus on his bipartisan organizing and, in several stories, its implications for broader coalition-building. Right-leaning outlets emphasize the push for disclosure without amendments while also reporting concerns about protecting people named in the files.
- ARTICLES
- 19
- OUTLETS
- 16
- AVG CRED
- 71
- Jefferson City News Tribune · Republicans hyped Epstein files for years — now Trump's under pressure to deliver
- East Bay Times · To win Epstein files, Rep. Ro Khanna befriended Republicans, ignored Democrats
- The Guardian · Congressman Ro Khanna warns officials not to impede Epstein files release: 'They will be prosecuted' | Jeffrey Epstein
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…