'I am horrified': Senator blasts Hirono's 'bizarre' leftist agenda to protect 'violent murderers, violent rapists' * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh
Hirono warned that the proposal would treat naturalized citizens as second-class citizens.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates WorldNetDaily, where this article appeared. The other scores rate the article itself.
WorldNetDaily is an identifiable outlet with a named author, but its strongly partisan reputation and limited evidence in this article warrant a low institutional credibility rating.
- Source type — Recorded as national news, but the outlet is known for strongly partisan coverage.
- Editorial standards — The framing is highly partisan and offers little independent context.
- Author attribution — The article names Bob Unruh as its author.
The article includes direct quotations from both senators, but relies heavily on Schmitt’s extended remarks and loaded descriptions of Hirono. It provides little independent context about the proposal or the hearing.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Although the article quotes Hirono’s objection, it devotes more space to Schmitt’s rebuttal and uses critical language about her without providing broader context or a response to his claims.
- Source diversity — The central exchange is quoted, but there is little independent sourcing or context.
- Loaded language — Terms such as “tirade” and “disgraced” contribute to a one-sided presentation.
- Counterarguments presented — Hirono’s objection is included, but the article does not develop or independently assess it.
- Omitted context — The article gives little detail about the proposal’s scope or the hearing beyond the exchange.
The headline and article use strongly critical language about Hirono and frame Schmitt’s response sympathetically, with little balancing context.
- Headline — Calls Hirono’s agenda “bizarre” and “leftist,” while presenting Schmitt as the one blasting it.
- Language tone — Uses loaded terms such as “tirade” and repeats hostile characterizations of Hirono.
- Source selection — Schmitt receives extensive quoted remarks, while Hirono’s position is represented mainly by one quotation.
Original publisher not identified
This article may be republished from another publisher, which has not been identified, so the scores are WorldNetDaily's own.
At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Eric Schmitt’s SCAM Act, Schmitt argued for deporting naturalized citizens convicted of certain crimes, while Mazie Hirono warned the approach would treat them as second-class citizens. The article recounts their sharp exchange.
At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Schmitt’s SCAM Act, Schmitt argued that naturalized citizens convicted of crimes including terrorism or wholesale welfare fraud should be deported. He said the measure would apply to people convicted in court, not merely accused.
Hirono said the proposal implied that naturalized citizens were second-class citizens and called that undemocratic and un-American. Schmitt responded that she was defending people who committed serious crimes; the article characterizes the exchange as a “firefight.”
Community verdict
17 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator who objected to Schmitt’s proposal at a committee hearing
Senator defending his SCAM Act proposal at a committee hearing
Schmitt's version of this story ↗President whose border and immigration agenda is mentioned
Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSAt a Senate Judiciary hearing, Eric Schmitt defended a proposal to strip citizenship from naturalized citizens convicted of certain crimes, while Mazie Hirono warned it could treat them as second-class citizens. Right-leaning outlets generally emphasize Schmitt’s forceful response and portray Hirono’s objections negatively; Fox News gives a more reportorial account of both senators’ positions.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 47
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


