Truth Tracker: Breaking down two dueling ads from Janet Mills, Graham Platner
Mills’ campaign aired an ad quoting Platner’s old online comments, which the article says were quoted accurately.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYWGME is a local news outlet with a named reporter, and the piece makes its own assessment of the ads’ claims. The short article provides little detail about its sourcing or corrections practices.
- Source type — A local news organization, a source type generally associated with newsroom reporting.
- Author attribution — The article names a WGME reporter.
- Editorial standards — The article distinguishes the campaigns’ claims and gives a clear assessment of the ad’s accuracy, though it offers limited detail about its verification.
- Transparency — The article identifies the campaigns and describes a poll, but gives few details about the poll or its sourcing.
The article includes both campaigns’ ads and directly assesses Mills’ ad as truthful, while providing Platner’s response and some context for the old posts. The poll is described without a pollster, figures, or methodology, and the piece offers limited independent detail about how the posts were verified.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents both candidates’ ads and Platner’s explanation, and it states that Mills’ ad is truthful. It gives little detail about the poll or additional context from either campaign.
- Counterarguments presented — Platner’s response and his explanation for the timing of the posts appear alongside the Mills campaign’s claims.
- Source diversity — The account relies chiefly on the candidates’ own ads and a briefly described poll.
- Omitted context — The article provides little detail about the poll or the process used to verify the posts.
- Loaded language — Strong language is quoted from the ads and their speakers rather than used as the article’s own verdict.
The article evaluates the accuracy of Mills’ ad and presents Platner’s response and context without adopting an evident partisan position.
- Language tone — The piece uses a fact-checking frame and attributes the ads’ statements to their campaigns.
- Source selection — It presents material from both candidates’ ads and reports the poll result without further interpretation.
- Framing — It concludes that Mills’ quoted claims are true, while also including Platner’s explanation and response.
A WGME truth-tracker reports that Janet Mills’ campaign ad accurately quotes old online comments by Graham Platner. Platner responds with an ad asking voters to consider the context, while the story says the ads’ effect on the race is unclear.
Mills’ campaign ad quotes comments Platner made on Reddit about 14 years ago concerning women and rape. Platner acknowledged making the posts; WGME says the ad’s quotations are true. His counter-ad calls the statements abhorrent and says he made them while struggling after returning from war.
The two candidates’ ads put Platner’s past statements and how voters should judge them at the center of the race, the article says. It reports that the ads’ impact was unclear, while a recent poll conducted just after the negative ads began airing showed Platner maintaining a large lead.
Community verdict
8 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 4
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 4 · ◆ 1 · ▼ 3
People in this story
SWIPE →Democratic Senate candidate whose campaign aired an ad about Platner’s past posts
Democratic Senate candidate who acknowledged old Reddit posts and answered with a campaign ad
Platner's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 75
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

