Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for HegsethDefense / Military

Hegseth starts proceedings against Sen. Mark Kelly over his remarks

Hegseth started administrative proceedings against Kelly and cited the senator’s public statements as grounds for action.

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Host credibilityWest Hawaii TodayNOT RATED
This article1 analysis · Oct 11, 2026

Credibility rates West Hawaii Today, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.

Republished with credit

Republished from The New York Times, with credit to the original publisher.

127 stories · 94–95 · updated Oct 12, 2026

This is The New York Times's own score, and this article is credited to The New York Times. The host score in the Source Check is West Hawaii Today's.

West Hawaii Todayvia The New York Times
Jan 6, 2026
tl;dr

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has started administrative proceedings against Sen. Mark Kelly that could reduce Kelly’s retired Navy rank and pension. Hegseth also issued a formal letter of censure over Kelly’s statements, including a video reminding service members they may refuse illegal orders.

Community verdict

24 VOTES
How does this story look for
Pete Hegseth R · Secretary of Defense

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 40

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Pete Hegseth
R · Secretary of Defense

Defense secretary who initiated proceedings and issued a letter of censure against Kelly

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Mark Kelly
D · AZ · SEN

Senator facing military administrative proceedings over his public statements

Kelly's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose ire over Kelly’s video is mentioned

ALSO MENTIONED  John Phelan, Navy secretary who received a letter from Kelly’s lawyer

Part of a bigger story

38 OUTLETS
Hegseth Censures Sen. Mark Kelly Over Troop-Orders Video

Outlets report that Hegseth issued a censure to Sen. Mark Kelly and opened proceedings that could reduce his retired military rank or pay. The action followed Kelly’s participation in a video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders. Left-leaning outlets largely cast the action as punishment for Kelly’s speech and a bid to silence him. Center outlets emphasize the censure and possible consequences while presenting Kelly’s response and, in some reports, legal or political questions. Right-leaning outlets, especially PJ Media, frame the proceedings as accountability for statements they portray as harmful to military discipline.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…