Hegseth starts proceedings against Sen. Mark Kelly over his remarks
Hegseth started administrative proceedings against Kelly and cited the senator’s public statements as grounds for action.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates West Hawaii Today, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The reporting is attributed to The New York Times, an established newsroom with strong editorial standards. The page identifies the original publication and carries its copyright notice.
- Track record — The reporting is credited to The New York Times, an established national newsroom.
- Editorial standards — The identified reporting organization is known for formal editorial standards.
- Author attribution — The page attributes the article to The New York Times.
- Transparency — The page states that the article originally appeared in The New York Times and includes its copyright notice.
The article provides direct quotations and details of the administrative action, while presenting responses from Kelly, his lawyer and Democratic senators. It offers limited independent explanation of the Navy’s process or its legal basis.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents Hegseth’s allegations and the stated grounds for the proceedings, as well as responses from Kelly, his lawyer and Democratic senators. It gives less space to an independent account of the military process or a defense of the action beyond Hegseth’s statements.
- Counterarguments presented — Kelly’s explanation and objections from his lawyer and Democratic senators are included.
- Source diversity — The article quotes Hegseth and Kelly’s side, though most perspectives are directly involved in the dispute.
- Omitted context — The article provides limited independent explanation of the Navy’s procedure and legal rationale.
- Loaded language — Strong characterizations are quoted and attributed rather than adopted as the article’s own language.
The report uses largely neutral language and attributes accusations and defenses to their speakers. It includes criticism of the proceedings but also reports Hegseth’s stated rationale and the claims in his letter.
- Language tone — Mostly factual wording; allegations and evaluations are attributed to their speakers.
- Source selection — Includes Hegseth’s accusations alongside Kelly’s and his allies’ responses.
- Framing — Frames the story around the proceedings and their stated basis, without an evident partisan conclusion.
Republished with credit
Republished from The New York Times, with credit to the original publisher.
127 stories · 94–95 · updated Oct 12, 2026
This is The New York Times's own score, and this article is credited to The New York Times. The host score in the Source Check is West Hawaii Today's.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has started administrative proceedings against Sen. Mark Kelly that could reduce Kelly’s retired Navy rank and pension. Hegseth also issued a formal letter of censure over Kelly’s statements, including a video reminding service members they may refuse illegal orders.
Hegseth said the proceedings could result in a reduction of Kelly’s retirement rank and military pension. He also issued a letter of censure for Kelly’s personnel file, citing statements that Hegseth said characterized military operations as illegal. The decision on rank and pension is expected within 45 days, according to Hegseth’s message.
The actions follow a video released in November in which Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds said service members are obligated to refuse illegal orders. Kelly and his lawyers said he was articulating a basic principle of military law; 12 Democratic senators and Kelly’s lawyer condemned the proceedings as political and an overreach.
Community verdict
24 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 40
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Defense secretary who initiated proceedings and issued a letter of censure against Kelly
Senator facing military administrative proceedings over his public statements
Kelly's version of this story ↗President whose ire over Kelly’s video is mentioned
Part of a bigger story
38 OUTLETSOutlets report that Hegseth issued a censure to Sen. Mark Kelly and opened proceedings that could reduce his retired military rank or pay. The action followed Kelly’s participation in a video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders. Left-leaning outlets largely cast the action as punishment for Kelly’s speech and a bid to silence him. Center outlets emphasize the censure and possible consequences while presenting Kelly’s response and, in some reports, legal or political questions. Right-leaning outlets, especially PJ Media, frame the proceedings as accountability for statements they portray as harmful to military discipline.
- ARTICLES
- 40
- OUTLETS
- 38
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


