Media proves rock bottom has basement with hatchet job of Natalie Harp
The columnist criticizes Ossoff for suggesting a personal relationship between Trump and Harp.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Washington Examiner is an established national outlet with a mixed institutional rating in the site's record. This article is an attributed opinion column, so its editorial argument should not be mistaken for independently balanced reporting.
- Source type — Established national news publisher, though this particular piece is opinion.
- Track record — The site's rating of 67 across 172 stories indicates a moderate record.
- Author attribution — The author is identified by name.
The column names outlets and quotes public remarks, but relies heavily on the author's characterization, uses selective examples, and offers little engagement with the outlets' explanations or other perspectives.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece is an openly one-sided defense of Harp and Trump, with no substantive response from the media outlets it criticizes and little examination of the basis for their reporting.
- Counterarguments presented — Does not develop the outlets' rationale or a response from them.
- Source diversity — Relies on selected media excerpts and the author's interpretation rather than a range of independent perspectives.
- Loaded language — Uses strongly judgmental terms to characterize the coverage and Ossoff's conduct.
The column strongly defends Trump and Harp while portraying Ossoff and several media outlets as unfair or biased. Its language is overtly critical of those targets and favorable to Trump-aligned figures.
- Language tone — Uses emphatic, derisive descriptions of Ossoff and media coverage, including calling the story a hatchet job.
- Framing — Frames coverage of Harp as an unfair smear and presents the media as biased against Trump.
- Source selection — Selects examples of critical coverage without presenting the outlets' fuller rationale or response.
Joe Concha argues that media coverage unfairly amplified Sen. Jon Ossoff’s insinuation about President Donald Trump and aide Natalie Harp. He contrasts that coverage with the way media discussed a former Obama aide and praises Harp’s work and loyalty to Trump.
Concha describes Harp as Trump’s executive assistant and says coverage of her relationship with Trump turned a normal workplace relationship into an insinuation of an affair. He criticizes Ossoff for comments at a rally and on television, and faults several news outlets for their framing and coverage.
The column contrasts that coverage with the account of Ferial Govashiri’s work for former President Barack Obama and subsequent job at Netflix. It says Harp received access to experimental treatment under Trump’s “right to try” law, recounts her remarks at the 2020 Republican National Convention, and describes letters she sent to Trump as consistent with her demanding job.
Community verdict
2 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator whose comments about Trump and Harp are criticized by the columnist
President and Harp’s employer, whose relationship with her is discussed in the column
Trump's version of this story ↗Former president mentioned in a criticism of a journalist’s work
Senator named in a hypothetical comparison about media reactions
Senator named in a hypothetical comparison about media reactions
Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Ossoff made remarks about President Donald Trump and aide Natalie Harp. Their coverage focuses on responses to those remarks and differing interpretations of what he said. Left-leaning outlets defend Ossoff’s remarks against Republican criticism and present his criticism of Trump as a message Democrats should amplify. Right-leaning outlets characterize the remarks as an insinuation about Trump and Harp, with one article portraying Ossoff’s explanation as a retreat.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 48
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




