Live updates: Markwayne Mullin faces confirmation hearing for DHS secretary
Paul challenged Mullin over classified travel information and reportedly blocked Katie Britt from introducing him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Washington Examiner is an established national outlet with an identifiable newsroom and attributed reporting. Its national-news status supports a solid rating, though this live blog includes an anonymous source’s sharply partisan claims and provides limited context in some updates.
- Source type — An established national-news publisher; a generally strong institutional signal.
- Transparency — The publication and newsroom are identified, and most updates are attributed to named reporters.
- Author attribution — Named reporters are credited on updates, although the page also uses a staff byline.
- Editorial standards — Reporting is mostly attributed, but an anonymous partisan source is quoted at length without independent identification.
The live updates report multiple exchanges and attribute most quotations to named participants. Some claims rely on unnamed sources or are presented with little corroborating context, and the format offers limited sustained explanation or response.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The live blog includes questions and positions from Republican and Democratic senators and reports Mullin’s answers. Some updates offer little countervailing context, especially the extended anonymous criticism of Paul and the brief reporting on the contract controversy.
- Source diversity — Senators from both parties speak, and Mullin’s responses are included.
- Counterarguments presented — Some exchanges include differing views, though not every allegation or warning receives a substantive response.
- Loaded language — The reporter’s narration is mostly restrained, but an anonymous source’s highly charged characterization of Paul is reproduced.
- Omitted context — The rapid-update format leaves some claims and disputes without fuller context.
The updates mostly report the hearing and attribute participants’ statements without adopting an explicit partisan argument. The anonymous source’s attack on Paul is quoted, but is clearly attributed rather than presented as the publication’s own judgment.
- Language tone — The reporter’s narration is generally descriptive; sharper language appears in attributed quotations.
- Source selection — The updates include statements and questions from senators of both parties.
- Framing — The headline and updates center on the confirmation hearing rather than an explicit partisan verdict.
At Markwayne Mullin’s confirmation hearing to lead the Department of Homeland Security, senators questioned him on immigration enforcement, agency contracts and other issues. Mullin expressed regret for a past remark and described how he would approach the department if confirmed.
During the hearing, Mullin said he regretted calling Alex Pretti a “deranged individual” before the facts were known, but did not directly apologize to Pretti’s family. He also said he would cooperate with an inspector general investigation into DHS contracting, and said he would not conduct the same kind of contract review as outgoing Secretary Kristi Noem.
Senators raised concerns and proposals on other matters. Rand Paul threatened to delay a confirmation vote while seeking information about Mullin’s classified travel; Joni Ernst warned that a DHS funding lapse could increase security risks. Mullin also discussed ICE’s role in immigration enforcement and working with sanctuary-city leaders, while Ruben Gallego, Elissa Slotkin and John Fetterman raised questions or proposals of their own.
Community verdict
23 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator and committee chairman questioning Mullin during the confirmation hearing
Senator and nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security appearing at a confirmation hearing
Mullin's version of this story ↗Senator who proposed a rapid-response fund for Jewish communities facing violence
President whose nominee Mullin appeared before the committee
Senator who urged colleagues to set aside personal grievances over Mullin’s nomination
Outgoing Homeland Security secretary whose contracting practices were discussed
Senator who supported Mullin and was reportedly prevented from introducing him
Senator who joked about a previous fight challenge involving Mullin
Former House speaker attending the hearing in support of Mullin
Senator who questioned Mullin about DHS funding and security risks
Senator who questioned Mullin’s approach to possible DHS investigations
Part of a bigger story
36 OUTLETSAt Markwayne Mullin’s Senate confirmation hearing for Homeland Security secretary, Rand Paul challenged him over past remarks about Paul’s assault and political violence, and said he would vote against the nomination. Left-leaning outlets center Paul’s criticism, with some presenting it as merited and relevant to Mullin’s fitness. Center outlets pair the confrontation with Mullin’s answers and questions about DHS policy, funding, immigration and travel. Right-leaning outlets also stress the clash, while some foreground Mullin’s rebuttal or question Paul’s conduct.
- ARTICLES
- 39
- OUTLETS
- 36
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…










