Skip to main content
1 min read
▲ Good look for SlotkinCongress / Members

Sen. Elissa Slotkin's Excitement Over Dems' Stunt Getting TMZ's Attention Gives Away the Game

The article cites Slotkin’s post thanking TMZ as evidence that the Democrats’ video was intended to draw attention.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin's Excitement Over Dems' Stunt Getting TMZ's Attention Gives Away the Game
Image · twitchy.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilitytwitchy.com38/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 13, 2026
Nov 21, 2025
tl;dr

Twitchy argues that Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s post thanking TMZ for an interview suggests the Democrats’ video about military orders was intended to attract attention. The article presents the post as evidence for that interpretation.

Community verdict

15 VOTES
How does this story look for
Elissa Slotkin D · MI · SEN

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 11

● OPEN
  • Readers of left-leaning coverage: 82% good look
  • Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Elissa Slotkin
D · MI · SEN

Senator whose post about a TMZ interview is presented as evidence of the video’s purpose

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose post about possible sedition penalties is mentioned as context

Pete Hegseth
R · Secretary of Defense

Defense secretary named in the embedded post describing the video

Part of a bigger story

10 OUTLETS
Trump Accuses Slotkin and Other Lawmakers of Sedition Over Video

President Donald Trump accused Sen. Elissa Slotkin and other Democratic lawmakers of sedition after they urged service members to refuse illegal orders in a video. Left-leaning outlets cast the lawmakers’ message as patriotic and Trump’s response as menacing. Center outlets largely recount competing claims and responses, with some attention to Slotkin’s security concerns. Right-leaning outlets frame the video as an attention-seeking stunt, treating Slotkin’s post as evidence of that interpretation.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…