Sen. Elissa Slotkin Cites 'A Few Good Men' as Example of Following Illegal Orders
Slotkin cited historical and fictional examples while discussing unlawful orders and answered a question about Trump’s conduct.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTwitchy is a blog, and this article uses strongly partisan framing alongside embedded social-media reactions rather than providing substantial independent reporting. The page identifies an author, but offers limited sourcing beyond attributed television interviews and posts.
- Source type — A blog with an overtly partisan presentation.
- Editorial standards — Loaded descriptions and social-media reactions shape the presentation.
- Author attribution — An author is named, though only by a brief byline.
- Transparency — The article attributes some statements to interviews and posts but provides little underlying documentation.
The article identifies the interviews and quotes Slotkin’s answer, but offers little independent context or verification. Its strongly evaluative language and reliance on selected social-media reactions limit the quality of the reporting.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Slotkin’s answer and Crow’s remarks, but it frames them negatively and selects critical reactions without offering a countervailing perspective or substantial context.
- Counterarguments presented — No supportive perspective on the lawmakers’ examples is presented.
- Loaded language — The narration and included reactions use disparaging and accusatory language.
- Source diversity — The article refers to television interviews but largely supplements them with critical social-media posts.
- Omitted context — It provides little context about the legal standards or the full interviews.
The article frames Slotkin and the Democrats’ video in strongly critical terms while presenting Trump’s conduct favorably. Its word choice and selection of reactions give the piece a clear right-leaning framing.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “bizarrely,” “insurrectionist” and “colossal backtracking.”
- Framing — Presents Slotkin’s examples as a failed justification of the Democrats’ video.
- Source selection — Includes critical social-media reactions without comparable supportive responses.
The article criticizes Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s examples of unlawful orders, including Nuremberg, the Vietnam War and the film “A Few Good Men.” It also reports that she said she was unaware of illegal orders from President Trump and quotes Joe Scarborough objecting to her answer.
The article reports that Slotkin cited Nuremberg, the Vietnam War and “A Few Good Men” when discussing unlawful orders. It also says Rep. Jason Crow gave sending troops to polling stations and killing terrorists’ families as examples when asked about illegal orders.
Asked whether Trump had issued illegal orders, Slotkin told ABC News, “To my knowledge, I am not aware of things that are illegal.” The article characterizes this as an admission that Trump had not issued illegal orders and says Scarborough responded, “Wrong answer!” Its framing calls the Democrats’ video “insurrectionist” and presents Slotkin’s examples as inadequate.
Community verdict
24 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 6
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator whose interview remarks about unlawful orders are the article’s focus
MS NOW host who criticized Slotkin’s answer
President discussed in Slotkin’s answer about illegal orders
Representative who gave examples of unlawful orders
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 56
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



