Sen. Chris Van Hollen Adds 'Went Through a Rough Period' *Exception to Having a Nazi Tattoo (*Dems-Only)
Van Hollen defended Senate candidate Graham Platner, saying he had gone through a rough period.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTwitchy is a blog whose strongly partisan commentary and limited sourcing on this page provide less evidence of independent reporting or robust editorial standards. The author is identified, but the article relies mainly on a short clip and social media posts.
- Source type — A blog, a source type with less institutional accountability than established newsrooms.
- Editorial standards — The article uses overtly partisan language and presents commentary alongside reporting.
- Track record — This short article offers little basis to assess original-reporting practices or corrections.
- Author attribution — An author is named.
The article includes a quoted clip and social media posts, but offers little independent reporting, context, or response from the people discussed. Its loaded language and one-sided presentation weaken the journalism.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece is overwhelmingly critical of Democrats and Van Hollen, uses loaded language, and offers no meaningful response or competing perspective from the people it criticizes.
- Counterarguments presented — No meaningful response from Van Hollen or Platner is included.
- Loaded language — Describes the defense as hypocrisy and uses other openly disparaging language.
- Source diversity — Relies on a short clip and posts from critics rather than a range of sources.
- Opinion vs reporting — Commentary and verdicts are prominent throughout the piece.
The article uses explicitly anti-Democratic language, calls the defense hypocritical, and presents the issue through a sharply critical partisan frame.
- Language tone — Uses condemnatory phrases such as “supreme show of irony and hypocrisy.”
- Framing — Frames Democrats’ support for Platner as evidence of hypocrisy.
- Source selection — Relies on a clip and social media posts critical of Van Hollen, without presenting a countervailing response.
Twitchy criticizes Sen. Chris Van Hollen for defending Senate candidate Graham Platner over a Nazi tattoo, quoting Van Hollen as saying Platner “went through a really rough period.” The article also faults Democrats for supporting Platner and highlights comments by Tim Walz and Michael Lawler.
Twitchy says Democrats are supporting Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner despite his Nazi tattoo. It criticizes Sen. Chris Van Hollen for defending Platner and quotes Van Hollen saying, “He went through a really rough period.” The article also refers to Platner’s social media posts, including a remark about women and rape.
The article calls Van Hollen’s defense hypocritical and contrasts the response to Platner’s tattoo with criticism of Hegseth’s Jerusalem Cross. It says Tim Walz planned to campaign for Platner and quotes Rep. Michael Lawler criticizing Van Hollen over his trip to El Salvador.
Community verdict
4 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 2
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 50% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 2 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 2
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator criticized for defending Graham Platner over his tattoo and social media posts
Public official whose Jerusalem Cross is used as a comparison
Minnesota governor who was to campaign for Platner
Representative who criticized Van Hollen in a social media post
Maine Senate candidate whose tattoo and social media posts are discussed
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 2
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 54
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





