Skip to main content
2 min read
▼ Bad look for CrockettCongress / Members

Name Game: Dem Jasmine Crockett's Two Epsteins Debacle Ends in a Dumb Double Down on CNN

Crockett defended her wording about donations linked to a Jeffrey Epstein and said she had not researched the doctor’s identity.

Name Game: Dem Jasmine Crockett's Two Epsteins Debacle Ends in a Dumb Double Down on CNN
Image · twitchy.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilitytwitchy.com38/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 13, 2026
Nov 20, 2025
tl;dr

Twitchy criticizes Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s response to a question about donations attributed to a Jeffrey Epstein, quoting her as saying she had not researched the doctor’s identity. The post frames her answer as a refusal to correct an earlier accusation.

Community verdict

10 VOTES
How does this story look for
Jasmine Crockett D · TX-30

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 34

● OPEN
  • Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
  • Readers of right-leaning coverage: 25% good look
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

Representative whose response to a question about an Epstein donation attribution is criticized

PRIMARY SUBJECT

Part of a bigger story

20 OUTLETS
Jasmine Crockett Names Jeffrey Epstein as Zeldin Donor in House Speech

Crockett named a Jeffrey Epstein as a donor to Lee Zeldin during a House speech; outlets on multiple sides report that the donor was a different person with the same name. She later said she had not meant the convicted sex offender. Left-leaning outlets focus on Crockett's mistaken identification and the criticism it drew. Center outlets likewise stress the error and Zeldin's rebuttal, with some articles also recounting her explanation or later reversal. Right-leaning outlets also stress the error, but more often present it as a political failure and her defense as inadequate.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…