Leader John Thune SHREDDED After Republicans Discover What He Made Time for INSTEAD of Passing SAVE Act
The article faults Thune for saying there was not enough time to vote on the SAVE Act while senators held a dog parade.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTwitchy is a blog with an overtly partisan, opinion-driven presentation. The piece is attributed to an author and links its central event to social-media posts, but offers little independent verification or response from the senator it criticizes.
- Source type — Blog format and overtly partisan presentation lower confidence in institutional neutrality.
- Editorial standards — The article uses advocacy-style language and does not show a clear separation between reporting and opinion.
- Author attribution — An author is named, though only by a shortened byline.
- Source transparency — Social-media posts are embedded, but there is no direct response from Thune or independent corroboration presented.
The piece identifies the reported Senate event and quotes social-media posts, but relies heavily on the author's assertions and loaded commentary. It provides no response from Thune, little context about the legislative process, and no competing perspective on the SAVE Act.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a strongly one-sided argument supporting the SAVE Act and criticizing Thune and the Senate. It provides no counterargument, response from Thune, or explanation of the bill’s contested provisions.
- Counterarguments presented — No opposing view of the bill or defense of the Senate’s schedule is included.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses derisive and emotionally charged language.
- Source diversity — Relies on the author’s assertions and selected social-media posts.
- Opinion vs reporting — Commentary and persuasion dominate the brief factual account.
The article strongly favors the Republican push for the SAVE Act and attacks Thune for not advancing it, using partisan framing and approvingly highlighting Trump’s call to pass it.
- Language tone — Uses ridicule and emphatic criticism, including saying Thune is “dragging his feet” and calling the Senate “useless.”
- Framing — Frames the dog parade as evidence that the Senate is neglecting election legislation.
- Source selection — Highlights pro-SAVE Act statements and social-media criticism without presenting an opposing view.
Twitchy criticizes Senate Majority Leader John Thune for not bringing the SAVE Act to a vote, contrasting his stated lack of time with a dog parade held in the Senate chamber. The article argues that the Senate should prioritize election legislation.
The article says President Donald Trump called for passage of the SAVE Act during his State of the Union address. It says Thune had recently said there was not enough time for a vote, then contrasts that with senators holding a dog parade in the chamber. A post quoted in the article describes it as Sen. Thom Tillis’ final dog parade and identifies Sen. Jim Justice as the owner of one of the dogs.
The author criticizes the Senate’s priorities and argues that the legislation would secure elections, including through voter ID requirements. The piece says election-related practices such as mail-in voting and ballot harvesting are harming Republicans, but does not include a response from Thune or an opposing view of the legislation.
Community verdict
23 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 10
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senate majority leader criticized for not bringing the SAVE Act to a vote
President who called for passage of the SAVE Act during his State of the Union address
Senator associated with the dog parade
Senator identified in a quoted post as the owner of one of the dogs
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSPresident Trump pressed Senate Majority Leader John Thune to advance the SAVE America Act, while Thune had not committed to using the talking filibuster Republicans are debating. Center outlets focus on whether Republicans can use the talking filibuster, including procedural doubts and Democratic opposition. Right-leaning outlets emphasize pressure to pass the bill, with some faulting Thune’s hesitation and others stressing Republican resistance to that procedure.
- ARTICLES
- 10
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 62
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




